Does anyone use StatFox?

**LT Profits** · 06-18-12, 11:56 AM

Basically useless, lots of meaningless datamined trends.

**skrtelfan** · 06-19-12, 05:27 PM

They have a good closing line database but yeah don't use the betting advice it's datamined crap.

**jgilmartin** · 06-19-12, 07:15 PM

Wait, so a team's W-L record when facing a left handed starting pitcher with a unibrow in the month of June when the chance of rain is between 10% and 15% isn't a predictive statistic? ****.

**LT Profits** · 06-19-12, 07:23 PM

Originally posted by jgilmartin

Wait, so a team's W-L record when facing a left handed starting pitcher with a unibrow in the month of June when the chance of rain is between 10% and 15% isn't a predictive statistic? ****.

Only on artificial turf on a Wednesday.

**alling** · 06-20-12, 07:13 PM

anything available to the public is a loser

**tim0402** · 06-20-12, 10:59 PM

public information is public

**BuddyBear** · 06-20-12, 11:05 PM

Like probably most people who found Statfox, at first I thought I had found a gold mine and even signed up for a 3 month membership. But after a few weeks I realized the information was basically worthless and made heavy use of systems. There really is not much use for stats fox anymore. All the information is public. Nothing special.