It seems like they're not taking the totals in account when pricing their RLs
I'm looking at the Braves / Dodgers game as well as the Twins / Mariners.
Dodgers are ML -133, -1.5 +160 with a total of 8 (-105o, -115u)
Mariners are ML -131, -1.5 +160 with a total of 7 (-115o, -105u)
-Both teams are home
Regardless of the total lean, shouldn't one expect ~7 cent gap based on the difference in totals? Or would the lean have anything to do with it?
Previously, Dodgers were -130, -1.5 at +165 (same total) - so a better price on the RL for basically the same fair money line AND a higher total.
No there's no edge to be had, but it's interesting that totals don't appear to be factored in (unless I'm missing something)
I'm looking at the Braves / Dodgers game as well as the Twins / Mariners.
Dodgers are ML -133, -1.5 +160 with a total of 8 (-105o, -115u)
Mariners are ML -131, -1.5 +160 with a total of 7 (-115o, -105u)
-Both teams are home
Regardless of the total lean, shouldn't one expect ~7 cent gap based on the difference in totals? Or would the lean have anything to do with it?
Previously, Dodgers were -130, -1.5 at +165 (same total) - so a better price on the RL for basically the same fair money line AND a higher total.
No there's no edge to be had, but it's interesting that totals don't appear to be factored in (unless I'm missing something)