Nhl correlated parlays

[mm9182]

I have a book that i can parlay the hockey puck lines (-1.5,+1.5) with the game totals..my first question, is this correlated? second question, which is the better side to take? (favorite and the over, or dog and the under)..my first thought was to basically blindly take the favorite -1.5 and over 5 total goals..any input would be greatly appreciated.

[mathdotcom]

Calculate the no-vig pinnacle line on the runline and total for each game, then figure out whether -1.5/O or +1.5/U is the option that costs you the most juice. Of course bet the one that costs you the least juice.

[jolmscheid]

Good insight there math...the question is can you do so blindly?

[mathdotcom]

I just answered his first two questions, he did not provide enough info to answer the 3rd.

[mm9182]

thanks for the input..iv been using the pinnacle move for awhile now..crazy how some of these smaller books have such big differences..looks like ill be taking nhl parlays..hopefully i dont lose my entire bankroll

[RickySteve]

Good insight there math...the question is can you do so blindly?

[ ] good

[ ] insight

[ ] should do blindly

[RickySteve]

I just answered his first two questions, he did not provide enough info to answer the 3rd.

[ ] answered

[Cicima6709]

So far this year, blind unders+dogs have probably been incredibly profitable. Who knows if that continues...