Suppose you take Team A @ -105
Just prior to game time the line is..
Team A +100
Team B -110
for a no vig line on Team A of +104.75
So far the closing line is beating you by 9.75 cents. I believe I recall Justin7 stating in one of his videos that 2 cents is worth about 1% in terms of an edge. That would make your current bet at -105 have value of -4.875%.
However if you were to bet Team B at -110 according to the SBR scalp calculator you would have a value of -3.475%. A difference of 1.4%.
Based on this it would appear as though in terms of long term growth you are better off making the negative value scalp as its -EV is less than just letting your bet ride.
Is my logic here well founded?
Just prior to game time the line is..
Team A +100
Team B -110
for a no vig line on Team A of +104.75
So far the closing line is beating you by 9.75 cents. I believe I recall Justin7 stating in one of his videos that 2 cents is worth about 1% in terms of an edge. That would make your current bet at -105 have value of -4.875%.
However if you were to bet Team B at -110 according to the SBR scalp calculator you would have a value of -3.475%. A difference of 1.4%.
Based on this it would appear as though in terms of long term growth you are better off making the negative value scalp as its -EV is less than just letting your bet ride.
Is my logic here well founded?