James Starks or Donald Brown?

**Chi_archie** · 12-12-14, 08:55 AM

I'd go with Starks, looks like Lacy might not go

**mpaschal34** · 12-12-14, 09:31 AM

Don't trust Donald Brown....so I guess Starks.

**convick** · 12-12-14, 12:01 PM

If Lacy and Matthews are both out you gotta go with Starks. Like the GB offense much more at this time.

**Timmay** · 12-12-14, 09:42 PM

Only problem is that it looks like Mathews might not play and that it looks like Lacey might share a work load.

It's a tough spot and being in the semi finals... It's like ahhhh!!!

Donald Brown if Mathews doesn't start though right?

**Wrigley** · 12-13-14, 12:28 AM

Id go with Starks also

**BigSpoon** · 12-13-14, 07:05 AM

I'd start Starks over Brown as well, don't trust Brown at all.

**LT Profits** · 12-13-14, 07:47 AM

If Mathews does not go, does that not make Branden Oliver viable?

**Auto Donk** · 12-13-14, 09:43 AM

if it was John Starks, id have to go with that punk......

**Timmay** · 12-13-14, 05:19 PM

Dude, I'm trippin' on this semi final.

My R.B.'s:
Ryan Mathews
Donald Brown
James Starks
Reggie Bush
Bishop Sankey

Should I just go with Bush and Sankey?....... I need high upside/value....

**Timmay** · 12-13-14, 06:33 PM

Any thoughts?

**mpaschal34** · 12-13-14, 09:43 PM

Sankey and upside value should never be used in the same sentence. Got a good laugh when you said that.

That group is a real mess.

**Timmay** · 12-13-14, 11:55 PM

Originally posted by mpaschal34

Sankey and upside value should never be used in the same sentence. Got a good laugh when you said that.

That group is a real mess.

What I mean is I wanted to know what people thought are a big gamble that has big upside, but some higher risk than others. I didn't want a ton of risk.

Many of these players are backups or starters that might not play, so I'm not too clear on who to chose.

Upside: Has variant potential
Value: Is just an overall better player and looks like the best player to chose.

I hope what I said kind of explained it a little more to where you get what I mean.

**mpaschal34** · 12-14-14, 12:12 AM

I understand what you meant...just had to bag on Sankey because he's been horrible.

Bush shy used have that big game potential, but does he still have that capability?

if Mathews is limited/out, then Donald Brown may have some decent upside potential.

definitely a tough batch to pick from.

**Timmay** · 12-14-14, 02:07 AM

Originally posted by mpaschal34

I understand what you meant...just had to bag on Sankey because he's been horrible.

Bush shy used have that big game potential, but does he still have that capability?

if Mathews is limited/out, then Donald Brown may have some decent upside potential.

definitely a tough batch to pick from.

Oh woops!!! I totally misread what you said. I thought you said that the two words value and upside should not be placed like that or something... Lol doh!!!

You meant Sankey shouldn't be in the same sentence.

I had a brain fart.

**Timmay** · 12-14-14, 05:33 AM

Dude, I'm trippin' on this semi final.

My R.B.'s:
Ryan Mathews
Donald Brown
James Starks
Reggie Bush
Bishop Sankey

Should I just go with Bush and Sankey?....... I need high upside/value....

**Chi_archie** · 12-15-14, 10:52 AM

if you need a couple long shot upside guys because you are lacking in a good all round team I think you are right to go with Bush and Sankey