The BS BCS

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • wal66
    SBR Hall of Famer
    • 10-14-08
    • 5305

    #1
    The BS BCS
    The B.S BCS

    The Bowl Championship Series. Sounds nice, does it not? If you were unfamiliar with the concept you might imagine this to mean a series of bowl games set up to deliver an overall champion. After all the word “series” by most definitions deals with a number of events. If you are familiar with the practice though you already know that it’s not a series at all. No there’s no elimination due to play, no ultimate champion due to victory after victory until there is no-one left to defeat. No equality in the process or even a finite answer to who is the best after it is all said and done. All we eventually have at the end of the Bowl Championship Series are more disgruntled fans, more topics for sports shows and fattened coffers for the major conferences.

    There lies the major appeal for the BCS from a business standpoint. It is a proverbial cash cow. Just take a look at the numbers and you’ll quickly see why only the fans want a change. The reported revenues from last year’s BCS game was $148,164,743. That’s just monies from television rights, sponsors and gate receipts. That money then get’s distributed amongst the conferences. The SEC, Big 12, Big Ten and Pac Ten getting $23,172,725 each. The ACC, Big East and Mountain West receiving $18,672,743 each and substantially less portions divided up amongst the rest. When you tally in what the individual cities generated in revenues from the boost in lodging, restaurants and entertainment you can see there is a lot of money at stake for everyone involved. You will also begin to understand why the BCS doesn’t want to see anyone mess with them.

    I have no problem with the BCS from a financial point of view. It is just good business. Because it is good business I don’t buy the premise that it was created to eliminate us having a split National Champion at year’s end either. We continue to have controversy when the last game is played. Because it is such good business I understand why the BCS can ignore our complaints with the system. I recognize the conference’s excuses as to why a playoff simply isn’t in the best interest of our student athletes. As a logical person though I also recognize the BS with the BCS.

    There are any number of scenarios on how to make a fair and just playoff system. We already have the templates in place in Division II and III schools. We could cut seasons back to 10 games, have the Conference Title games decide who advances to the playoffs or any number of other ideas could be developed and researched. There would be no need to eliminate the other existing bowls outside the BCS because there would still be plenty of teams not making the playoffs to participate in those games and continue to generate revenues. There are plenty of intelligent people out there who could work out a scheme to deliver us a true National Champion, but as long as the money is right the solutions will be ignored.

    So what is a fan to do? We call in to the local sports radio shows and we complain. We watch ESPN and listen to their utter disgust at the current system and we blog about how unfair it is for the Utah’s of the world to get shunned. We do a whole lot of nothing. Making a change in this or anything else doesn’t happen without making it happen. So what can we do to make it happen? Hit them where it hurts the most, their pockets. It’s not that difficult to do. It wouldn’t take years to see a change. It would happen practically overnight if it was done right. What? What can make such a sudden change? Don’t go!

    I know it sounds silly. My team is playing in the Fiesta bowl for the BCS Championship and I’m supposed to just stay home? I’m supposed to watch a basketball game or reruns on Nic at Night instead of watching my school win another championship? Yes. That is what it will take to make a change. As long as the BCS take in the kind of money that is generated they have no reason to change anything. As long as the conference’s get to divide up the profits they have no reason to change anything. Take away that money and they have no fight left in them. Take away those profits and they will have to listen. A small sacrifice on a huge scale can make colossal change.
  • wal66
    SBR Hall of Famer
    • 10-14-08
    • 5305

    #2
    No-one? Not a single solitary opinion?
    Comment
    • Mac4Lyfe
      SBR Aristocracy
      • 01-04-09
      • 48366

      #3
      I think an 8 team playoff would generate even more revenue. Americans have a blood lust for everything football and a playoff would not diminish that fact. LaTech vs Hawaii last night got more viewers than the baseball game last night. I think an 8 team playoff with all the winners of the BCS conferences plus invites would do it. Maybe even a 16 team playoff as well. Either way, a champion should be won on the field and not in the field of opinions.

      I would keep all the current bowl games but with an 8 team playoff that would mean just 3 extra games. Those 3 extra games should be rotated at the current BCS bowl venues.
      Comment
      • wal66
        SBR Hall of Famer
        • 10-14-08
        • 5305

        #4
        Mac we all agree, well a vast majority agree that a playoff is warranted but the question is how to we make it happen. My suggesting an all out boycott is but one example of making a change. There has to be other opinions about how we go from TALKING about a change and actually FORCING a change to take place.

        The NBA has a lockout on referees that want change because they can get others to call the games. Players go on strike we get scrubs to take their place. If the fans refuse to attend or eve watch it is impossible to simply replace them.

        My approach is ratical and would take an enormous effort. Maybe there is a different way to bring about change but it's not likely happening in the very near future.
        Comment
        • wal66
          SBR Hall of Famer
          • 10-14-08
          • 5305

          #5
          Oh and Mac............you see I have to resort to coming up with log reading topics to get SBR's attention and make the scroll roll to build back up those points I gave away last weekend.
          Comment
          • Mac4Lyfe
            SBR Aristocracy
            • 01-04-09
            • 48366

            #6
            LOL - I still don't see how you could have taken "Da U".

            I've also said the same thing about boycotting games but not bowl games. First you send a letter to all the Presidents around the country lobbying their support of a playoff. The one's that don't support it, you send a follow up letter that basically says that if they don't agree, that the fanbase will boycott games. You would then compile a list of the schools whose presidents don't agree and you take the cupcake team on their schedule and boycott. These cupcake games (every team has them) are only money makers. We stop the flow of money for that game and it doesn't effect the outcome of the game because the team should win anyway. You then send another letter saying that you will boycott even more games and I bet you that not one president will want this to happen. Change would happen immediately.

            It's going to take the fans to make this happen but unfortunately, there are a lot of fans who like the current system. Big10 and Pac1 fans don't want it to change because they have a decided advantage for getting into BCS bowls.
            Comment
            • BiffTFinancial
              SBR Posting Legend
              • 01-29-09
              • 22670

              #7
              Ok, i'll bite. you make some good points, and i agree with a lot of what you wrote. there's no denying that support for the BCS is money-driven [if it wasn't, the logical solution of a plus-one playoff wouldn't be so quickly dismissed]. however, i think that a few things need to be said:

              1. don't underestimate the impact of the NFL on this process. the NFL is THE cash cow in sports and for espn. a CFB playoff that coincides with the NFL playoffs is threatening to the NFL. personally, i prefer college to NFL, and don't think that the thought of, say, Florida and USC pitted in a 35-30 playoff game as compared to a 20-3 Ravens/Broncos game on the same weekend doesn't make the NFL sweat. no one mentions the NFL in BCS reform, and to be clear, it's not as if the NFL is at the negotiating table; however, espn is, and they're not about to screw with their most valuable commodity.

              2. i am categorically opposed to reducing the length of the CFB season for 120 teams to 10 games so that we can add 7 playoff games to achieve an 8-team playoff. as important as picking a champion is, CFB's regular season is the best regular season in sports, and shouldn't be monkeyed with unless absolutely necessary. if the argument for BCS reform is couched as an effort to achieve fairness and wealth-distribution to lesser conferences, if given a choice, i'd bet the MACs and Sun Belts of the world would prefer to keep their 12 games and forego a shot at the playoffs. they'd be giving up revenue, not receiving more.

              3. As a corollary to my previous point, there is no disputing that the CFB regular season is as important as it is b/c of the fact that it serves as a de facto playoff system. it's the reason why Miami-Oklahoma, USC-Cal, and even LSU-Georgia are such life-or-death games this weekend, as the losers will be eliminated from the national title picture [assuming that LSU and Georgia are in the discussion to begin with, but i think you see what i mean]. i actually think that the BCS likes the controversy and even vitriol that it generates. it has people talking about and debating college football. any playoff system will have to be narrow enough not to devalue the regular season. i think that an 8-team playoff system could work without devaluing the regular season, and a 4-team playoff definitely could.

              4. If a playoff is what you want, i think that relying upon the idea that Utah was slighted doesn't help you. If anyone on the boards really thinks that Utah was a better team than Bama last season, please speak up now so that i can avoid your picks going forward. Bama showed up unprepared and Utah pushed them around, sure, but the real argument in favor of reform there is that the current system resulted in the #4 team in the nation showing up for the Sugar Bowl with nothing to play for and getting trounced. As a gambler and football fan, i find that highly offensive [and i didn't bet Bama, either]. A plus-one playoff system could address that motivational issue, at least in part, depending upon how the teams in the plus-one game are determined. I think that games like the Sugar Bowl definitely point up the need for BCS reform, but not b/c Utah deserved better.

              5. While i agree that a boycott would be effective, it may be a logistical and even logical impossibility. That is, if everyone as thoughtful and educated re: the subject as you, sure it could happen, but we live in a place where 2 of 3 people can't find Iraq on a globe. Most college football fans aren't looking for perfect equity in a playoff system, they're looking for a chance to head to a warm place during the holidays, get loaded and hang out with a bunch of like-minded fans. The demand for bowl tickets at some schools is unreal, and i doubt that demand for the average bowl would increase at the average school just b/c of a playoff system [of course, there'd be great demand for playoff tickets]. And while many people may question the propriety of the BCS methodology, when the games come on, they tune in.

              6. So if I don't think that a boycott could work, how do we create meaningful BCS reform? Congress certainly isn't the answer, and espn isn't listening. I would think that the best way would be a grass-roots effort to institute a playoff process and name an "alternative" champion. That is, launch a site devoted to critiquing the BCS and pointing out its flaws on a regular basis [e.g, relative position of Penn St/Iowa, Ok St/Houston in certain polls b/c coaches don't even have time to watch games but must vote]. Then, come bowl time, partner with a site that computer simulates games and conduct your own playoffs, essentially showing fans exactly of what the BCS deprives them. A lot of effort, and perhaps a bit pie-eyed, but probably easier than organizing massive boycotts.
              Comment
              • TheSkeptic
                SBR High Roller
                • 09-28-09
                • 176

                #8
                Not having a playoff does make the regular season better. No one really watches college basketball's regular season - the ratings are all in the playoffs. The ratings are also low for NHL and NBA's regular season which let over half their teams qualify for the playoff. Also, has there really been that much argument about the winner not being national champion? I'd say the majority of the debate has been should the runner up have been there? I would be in favor of a playoff but its not just the finances of the BCS that would be affected...its also the finances of the regular season. Ratings would go down if every game did not mean the world. The regular season in NCAAF IS the playoff.

                ps: if i were to develop a system, it would involve 6 teams. 2 teams would have byes. You'd use two of the BCS bowls which would pit #3 vs #6 and #4 vs #5 and the winners of those two games would play the byes in the remaining two bowls. The winner would be decided in the national title game, rotated as it is currently. The two "wild cards" could be at large with the #1-#4 seeds being decided by the BCS ranking.
                Last edited by TheSkeptic; 10-01-09, 02:53 PM. Reason: typo
                Comment
                • wal66
                  SBR Hall of Famer
                  • 10-14-08
                  • 5305

                  #9
                  Alot to take in Biff but one thing real quick. I could be wrong but I think you would have an easier time convincing the students to boycott than you would the alumni. The youth are all about change as long as it's trendy. What could be more trendy than taking on the establishment?

                  As far as the smaller schools losing monies that are desperately needed for their programs to survive I agree there would need to be something in place to help offset those losses. There will obviously be revenues generated having the playoff games and portions from each could be divided up for the smaller schools. Not as simple as that but the concept is there.

                  Taking the time as you did to put an idea out there is a start. We need more starters out there. We need more doers as well. Voices today, actions tomorrow.

                  Thanks for commenting Biff.
                  Comment
                  • Ralphie
                    Restricted User
                    • 09-20-09
                    • 190

                    #10
                    January madness, 64 team playoff, get your brackets ready.
                    Comment
                    • BadFinger
                      SBR High Roller
                      • 04-21-08
                      • 132

                      #11
                      add one game only with #1 vs #4 and #2 vs #3 and play it on the monday after 1st round of nfl playoffs
                      Comment
                      • BiffTFinancial
                        SBR Posting Legend
                        • 01-29-09
                        • 22670

                        #12
                        Originally posted by BadFinger
                        add one game only with #1 vs #4 and #2 vs #3 and play it on the monday after 1st round of nfl playoffs
                        i think that's the most ideal solution. it could disrupt school and bowl system relatively little [just one extra game for 2 teams], and much of it could fit within the framework we have right now. i think i'd be comfortable with a 4-team playoff being sufficient to establish which team is best in nation. although the orrin hatchs of the world wouldn't agree for obvious reasons, i think that the BCS does a decent job of producing the top 4 teams. at the very least, rarely would be the case that you could credibly argue that #5 or #6 is clearly better than those above them.

                        sure thing, wal66. a lot more interesting that what i was doing otherwise.
                        Comment
                        SBR Contests
                        Collapse
                        Top-Rated US Sportsbooks
                        Collapse
                        Working...