Um And Nevada

**bigboydan** · 12-31-06, 05:05 PM

I like Nevada +3.5 bro.

**STEELCURTAIN3288** · 12-31-06, 05:06 PM

I hear you how do you feel about the over/under?

**bigboydan** · 12-31-06, 05:08 PM

I would probably go with the under if I had to bet it.

**BuddyBear** · 12-31-06, 05:12 PM

Lean to Nevada...but won't be betting it.

**Razz** · 12-31-06, 06:16 PM

I think under is the best play of all. Nevada has this reputation as a high-scoring, no defense, typical WAC team. The opposite is true. They play extremely good defense, and though Rowe is the face of the team, Hubbard and the running game - along with the short passing game - is how they get their wins. Everyone knows about Miami's defense, but as good as it is, the offense is equally as bad. Nevada should control it. Most of the points that are scored will be on long drives, and I think both defenses buckle down in the red zone.

**STEELCURTAIN3288** · 12-31-06, 06:42 PM

good points I am feeling the under also.

**onlooker** · 12-31-06, 08:52 PM

I have the OVER, and it looks like you UNDER bettors are going to cash this one.

**Razz** · 12-31-06, 09:53 PM

Originally posted by onlòóker

I have the OVER, and it looks like you UNDER bettors are going to cash this one.

Would look great if not for that two or three minute sequence near the end of the half.

**onlooker** · 12-31-06, 10:11 PM

Originally posted by Razz

Would look great if not for that two or three minute sequence near the end of the half.

Yeah, looks like Im still alive for my OVER. If Nevada could just tie it up at 21, Id be all set for it. Lets go Wolfpack.

**onlooker** · 12-31-06, 10:25 PM

I just got robbed by the zebras again. That was a catch with the legs, and they didnt over turn the call on the field. How the hell can they look at the play and not see it not touching the blue turf? Amazing.

**Razz** · 12-31-06, 10:25 PM

How in the hell was that not ruled a catch?

**bigboydan** · 12-31-06, 11:26 PM

Originally posted by Razz

How in the hell was that not ruled a catch?

I last reply they showed on ESPN before they made that final ruling show it was clearly a catch. I thought that catch before they guy made on that same drive was more questionable than the one he caught between his legs they didn't allow.