Help with making a graph

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • poochiecollins
    SBR MVP
    • 01-27-09
    • 1782

    #1
    Help with making a graph
    I apparently forget too much algebra. I'm trying to have one scale going from 4 to 9, with a value of 300 starting at four that decreases by 2/3 every point to 9. On my TI-83 calculator, I have set the window at:
    Xmin= 4
    Xmax= 9
    Xscl=1
    Ymin= 0
    Ymax=350
    Yscl= 10
    Xres= 1
    I made the function: y= 2/3x + 300

    I graphed that, and a horizontal line formed at y=300. I want to be able to trace values of >300 part for every 1/10th of a point on the first scale, 4-9. What am I doing wrong?
  • princecharles
    SBR Wise Guy
    • 11-22-10
    • 827

    #2
    you can google a web based graph makin gsite..pretty good
    Comment
    • Blax0r
      SBR Wise Guy
      • 10-13-10
      • 688

      #3
      Originally posted by poochiecollins
      I apparently forget too much algebra. I'm trying to have one scale going from 4 to 9, with a value of 300 starting at four that decreases by 2/3 every point to 9. On my TI-83 calculator, I have set the window at:
      Xmin= 4
      Xmax= 9
      Xscl=1
      Ymin= 0
      Ymax=350
      Yscl= 10
      Xres= 1
      I made the function: y= 2/3x + 300

      I graphed that, and a horizontal line formed at y=300. I want to be able to trace values of >300 part for every 1/10th of a point on the first scale, 4-9. What am I doing wrong?
      I don't think you're doing anything wrong.

      I think it seems horizontal because of 1) the dimensions of your window and 2) the y-intercept just dominates the value of y for the domain you've chose for x.

      I think the ti-83 has a feature that lets you get "y" for any "x" you input; check out the calc features (hit 2nd then trace). It may just be called "value".

      Also, you could try adjusting your Xscl value to .1 (the scale of the x-axis), and the Ymin to 275.
      Last edited by Blax0r; 04-25-11, 04:26 PM.
      Comment
      • poochiecollins
        SBR MVP
        • 01-27-09
        • 1782

        #4
        Originally posted by Blax0r
        I don't think you're doing anything wrong. I think it seems horizontal because of 1) the dimensions of your window and 2) the y-intercept just dominates the value of y for the domain you've chose for x. I think the ti-83 has a feature that lets you get "y" for any "x" you input; check out the trace features (hit 2nd then trace). It may just be called "value". Also, you could try adjusting your Xscl value to .1 (the scale of the x-axis), and the Ymin to 275.
        I want the Y value to decrease by 2/3 for every point of X. So, where X is 4, Y is 300, X=5 where Y=200, 6 to 133, 7 to 89, 8 to 59, and 9 to 40, rounding off decimals. When I trace, the relation is nothing like that.

        Edit: I've corrected the slope to negative 2/3x, so at least there's the negative trend moving right that I want. This stuff is slowly coming back to me
        Comment
        • Blax0r
          SBR Wise Guy
          • 10-13-10
          • 688

          #5
          Originally posted by poochiecollins
          I want the Y value to decrease by 2/3 for every point of X. So, where X is 4, Y is 300, X=5 where Y=200, 6 to 133, 7 to 89, 8 to 59, and 9 to 40, rounding off decimals. When I trace, the relation is nothing like that.

          Edit: I've corrected the slope to negative 2/3x, so at least there's the negative trend moving right that I want. This stuff is slowly coming back to me
          ohh yea, flipping the slope should fix that. I missed that part in your original message. Also, I think you can get the ti-83 to tabulate the values (should be easy enough to google) so you don't have to worry about using the tracing tool on the graph screen.

          also, i recommend getting the latest version of the ti-89; probably will cost around $150, but it's really worth it.
          Comment
          • poochiecollins
            SBR MVP
            • 01-27-09
            • 1782

            #6
            Originally posted by Blax0r
            ohh yea, flipping the slope should fix that. I missed that part in your original message. Also, I think you can get the ti-83 to tabulate the values (should be easy enough to google) so you don't have to worry about using the tracing tool on the graph screen. also, i recommend getting the latest version of the ti-89; probably will cost around $150, but it's really worth it.
            Oh, I guess I didn't make it clear in my last post that the graph's still not doing what I want. E.g. when I trace from 4 to 5 on the x-axis, the y-value goes from 300 to 297-something.
            Comment
            • princecharles
              SBR Wise Guy
              • 11-22-10
              • 827

              #7
              How did the webbased idea work out>??;
              Comment
              • poochiecollins
                SBR MVP
                • 01-27-09
                • 1782

                #8
                Originally posted by princecharles
                How did the webbased idea work out>??;
                I've Googled for help a few times. One thing I found the other day is that I think to get the downward-sloping curve that the line should be, the slope would have to be a fractional power, like the cube route of two or something.

                If there's an Internet tool that could create a line based on the relationship between multiple plot points, that'd be great and would also answer what I'm looking for, if anyone's aware of such or knows what to search.
                Comment
                • dr_wolf
                  SBR Sharp
                  • 07-20-10
                  • 417

                  #9
                  First time you need to make 2 axes x,y and you you have a function f(x)=y so you need only to calculate the values >300,and after that compare the values.
                  Comment
                  • poochiecollins
                    SBR MVP
                    • 01-27-09
                    • 1782

                    #10
                    Originally posted by dr_wolf
                    First time you need to make 2 axes x,y and you you have a function f(x)=y so you need only to calculate the values >300,and after that compare the values.
                    Why, since nothing goes over 300, within my parameters?
                    Comment
                    SBR Contests
                    Collapse
                    Top-Rated US Sportsbooks
                    Collapse
                    Working...