I think we should not list plays as B or C if they do not qualify until back test is done. its going to lead people to bet personal bets and not system bets.
i was referring to NHL as well as the jets beat the wings and the ducks beat the rangers to add to the NBA win
confusion abound again
does a B Bet mean second bet and C bet means third bet? As in your first A bet with the spurs lost, so for their second game, it is a B bet in which you put in X amount for an overall 1 unit win?
Refer to my post with the plays. It lays out A B C amounts.Originally Posted by kevintran32
does a B Bet mean second bet and C bet means third bet? As in your first A bet with the spurs lost, so for their second game, it is a B bet in which you put in X amount for an overall 1 unit win?
wrong board not sure how to delete
-bonhammer
Last edited by bonhammer; 11-05-13 at 09:18 PM.
wallco do you dont care about the 3.5 filter? Spurs closing line were -7,5 and they only wob by 6?15.01 units.
Last edited by knugen; 11-05-13 at 11:07 PM.
Another 0-fer. This system, and any "variation of it" is a bankroll cancer1-7-5 system
*Not traditional John Morrison System*
UPCOMING PLAYS
11/5/2013
V1 UTA +10.5 (A) VS BRK
V3 LAL +8.5 (A) VS DAL
Playing them all for now, 3.5 means nothing to me when playing an ATS system. The backtest isn't completely finished, but I like what I'm seeing so far. Not enough yet to tell everyone to try it, but good enough for me.wallco do you dont care about the 3.5 filter? Spurs closing line were -7,5 and they only wob by 6?
Yes, your seven game sample size makes you a true authority for that comment. This cancer has made me money the past three seasons, guess you're not playing it right.Another 0-fer. This system, and any "variation of it" is a bankroll cancer
Points Awarded:
Boyne gave Wallco99 1 SBR Point(s) for this post.
takethepnts gave Wallco99 1 SBR Point(s) for this post.
1-7-5 system
*Not traditional John Morrison System*
Bet Sizing
A) Risk 1.1u to win 1u
B) Risk 8.91u to win 8.1u
C) Risk 16.51u to win 15.01u
Profit: -1.4
Record:
A) 3-4
B) 0-0
C) 0-0
RULES:Reference Post #184
SCHEDULE: post #78
RECAP
11/5/2013
V1 UTA +9.5(A) VS BRK
V3 LAL +9 (A) VS DAL
UPCOMING PLAYS
11/6/2013 V2 LAC (A) VS ORL
11/6/2013 V3 DAL (A) VS OKC *This one should be fun to watch
11/6/2013 v1 UTA (B) VS BOS
11/7/2013 V3 LAL (B) VS HOU *
Points Awarded:
analyzer gave J.M. Disciple 1 SBR Point(s) for this post.
I've got a handle on it, but really do appreciate the offer. Thanks.
Last edited by Wallco99; 11-06-13 at 02:31 PM.
Atlanta and San Antonio won...positive units for me.Another 0-fer. This system, and any "variation of it" is a bankroll cancer
Wallco made 10 units last night just on the four games (give or take). I didn't as I'm not quite playing it as he is until my bankroll gets a bit more in it after the fiasco of the NFL this past weekend.
Good luck this season guys
Came back to this site just to follow the 1-7-5
Hopefully chase 110 will have a good year also
Points Awarded:
Boyne gave Panksy 1 SBR Point(s) for this post.
I'm not totally convinced by the concept of the 1-7-5 strategy versus the 0-7-5 strategy. The 7-5 strategy was borne out of the win/loss ratio of the traditional JM A bet, which has been clearly shown to lose in the long run and thats with the 3 point buy as well. I fully understand that last season the A bets performed well, but historically, they are a waste of money. However, I also recognise that the basic spread odds do not require the same level of success (target 56%) as the spread +3 odds (target approx 60%).Good luck with the back test, Wallco, but I believe last year was a (welcome) blip in the stats Regards. Kev
