Isn't Phoenix playing New Orleans today?Originally Posted by J.M. Disciple
RECAP 11/2/2013
A. Houston -6 vs Utah
NEXT PLAYS
11/3/2013 V3 PHO (A) VS OKC
11/3/2013 V1 ATL (A) VS LAL
PROFIT: -$10
Record
A) 1-1
B) 0-0
C) 0-0
Reference Post #184
nope they're playing OKCIsn't Phoenix playing New Orleans today?
You are correct. I was looking at Tuesday's schedule.nope they're playing OKC
Correct3.5 plus the spread. Take SA on Friday. They were favored by 7.5 (my line). They won the game by 6 points...losing to the spread by 1.5 points, therefore no play on actual 7/5. If they had won the game by only 3 points, they would lost to the spread by 4.5, therefore making it a play on the B game at 7 units.
Is this correct Wallco/Limit?
why is there no mention of SAS? I agree that all of this doesn't need to be posted as the schedule is laid out but if you are going to post, do it consistently please. same issue with jm nhlRECAP 11/2/2013
A. Houston -6 vs Utah
NEXT PLAYS
11/3/2013 V3 PHO (A) VS OKC
11/3/2013 V1 ATL (A) VS LAL
PROFIT: -$10
Record
A) 1-1
B) 0-0
C) 0-0
Reference Post #184
jm nhl you never list result from prior night...you just update the record.
JM,
What's confusing people is these plays are being posted according to a different betting method/system than the original way it was intended. So I'm guessing if you don't include the original way the plays should be then you are going to get a lot of people not understanding this thread all season.
Spurs lose again
I'm not confused. But if he's calling this the JM system then he needs to post it somehow whether that be via asterisks or whatever is easiest. two different posts would be the cleanest but being someone who creates and posts systems I know how much time that takesJM,
What's confusing people is these plays are being posted according to a different betting method/system than the original way it was intended. So I'm guessing if you don't include the original way the plays should be then you are going to get a lot of people not understanding this thread all season.
Even though I play the 1-7-5, I have to agree with these people. There are now 7 different bet strategies that we have come up with to play the JM NBA system, including a second way to play the 1-7-5 which includes more games than I initially laid out, which when I am finished this test, will hopefully prove to be the strongest method. Not everybody is playing 1-7-5, or 7/5, or 1-3-5, or (-110) 1-1-1, or 3/3, or 3/5, or even traditional for that matter. The JM posts should probably remain the same way that they always have in this thread, and that is by listing the actual plays the way the system is described in the .pdf. Actually, the best way to list them would be as if all games were just plaid for 1 unit on (-110) lines. Then the other players could just skip the plays they are not playing, or stop the series that they already won, instead of guessing what their plays are or asking why it isn't listed. By doing it this way, ALL plays will be listed, and not just the ones that qualify for 7/5 criteria. I realize that the schedule is posted and people should have no reason to wait for someone to post, but you know that is NEVER going to happen in this thread. A lot of people just play traditional JM at all (-110) odds. These people were not properly informed by the update because the San Antonio game would have been a (B) bet for them, as well as the way I play it also. It is better to list NON FILTERED plays so people can choose their own filters to use rather than listing filtered plays and causing confusion. I liked the fact that you were posting it 1-7-5 style, but I feel that this arguement is going to happen every time a play doesn't qualify on (B) bet by the 7/5 criteria because many people will still be playing that (B) bet with their bet strategy.
Do whatever you wish, I have my own spreadsheets and know every game I am playing ahead of time. Besides, the standings you are posting don't even reflect the way I actually play 1-7-5 anyway. Good luck.
Last edited by Wallco99; 11-03-13 at 09:52 AM.
Points Awarded:
allidoiswin89 gave Wallco99 2 SBR Point(s) for this post.
Wallco is correct. Everyone needs their own spreadsheet. Download the one I made on post #78. It is editable. I've already added columns to it showing units won and lost so I can reference it when making my plays. If you don't have a spreadsheet, you might as well burn your money or, better yet, give it to a charity than giving it to your bookie, casino, online account. You won't have to keep coming on here looking for the plays when it's possible that the poster is unable to post the plays...and you're screwed. Don't expect the plays to be on here...plan for them not to be, and when they show up, compare the plays to what you should already have.
Points Awarded:
imotiv8 gave BuckeyeKaptn 2 SBR Point(s) for this post.
couldn't agree moreEven though I play the 1-7-5, I have to agree with these people. There are now 7 different bet strategies that we have come up with to play the JM NBA system, including a second way to play the 1-7-5 which includes more games than I initially laid out, which when I am finished this test, will hopefully prove to be the strongest method. Not everybody is playing 1-7-5, or 7/5, or 1-3-5, or (-110) 1-1-1, or 3/3, or 3/5, or even traditional for that matter. The JM posts should probably remain the same way that they always have in this thread, and that is by listing the actual plays the way the system is described in the .pdf. Actually, the best way to list them would be as if all games were just plaid for 1 unit on (-110) lines. Then the other players could just skip the plays they are not playing, or stop the series that they already won, instead of guessing what their plays are or asking why it isn't listed. By doing it this way, ALL plays will be listed, and not just the ones that qualify for 7/5 criteria. I realize that the schedule is posted and people should have no reason to wait for someone to post, but you know that is NEVER going to happen in this thread. A lot of people just play traditional JM at all (-110) odds. These people were not properly informed by the update because the San Antonio game would have been a (B) bet for them, as well as the way I play it also. It is better to list NON FILTERED plays so people can choose their own filters to use rather than listing filtered plays and causing confusion. I liked the fact that you were posting it 1-7-5 style, but I feel that this arguement is going to happen every time a play doesn't qualify on (B) bet by the 7/5 criteria because many people will still be playing that (B) bet with their bet strategy.
Do whatever you wish, I have my own spreadsheets and know every game I am playing ahead of time. Besides, the standings you are posting don't even reflect the way I actually play 1-7-5 anyway. Good luck.
all questions asked today and last night can be answered by reading the last two pages
please read
#1 I am not going to recap SAS as a B bet because they lost their A bet and did not qualify via the 3.5 filter clearly laid out by Thelimit. Please read the thread and you would know this, its also referenced in my post.
#2 If you think there is a play that I missed when posting than check the schedule on post #78 and see if its there. If its not there than it is not a play. If you still believe its a play please check and see how many road games the team is playing and make sure its not the middle of their road trip.
#3 I will continue to post the plays via 1-7-5 method since that is the strongest proven method. I do not see the point in posting traditional method when it in fact does not make the most money season to season. Spread sheet is on post #78 so if you are playing traditional and know all the filters than download the spread sheet and GTFO of this thread. We are not playing ml on favorites. Everything is via closing line on covers ATS.
good stuff JMD! Everything is plain and simple
