No. I'm prejudiced that way.
8.26.14 US OPEN
ATP: Andujar +1.5 sets @ -145
WTA: Diyas-Tsurenko Over 21 @ -112
ATP: Garcia-Lopez @ +155
ATP: Coric @ +250
ATP: Smyczek @ -110
Well your avatar does resemble Mel Gibson.Originally Posted by EaglesPhan36
No. I'm prejudiced that way.
is andujar a typo? i see the line at +2.5 sets (-155)
Yeah it was prob a typo. I got +2.5 at -145 through betdsi.
is betdsi for u.s. players too?
Yes, US accepted
EP, just running this by you for a possible typo...8.25.14 US OPEN
ATP: Rola +2.5 sets @ -140
ATP: Gimeno-Traver @ -150
ATP: Klahn-Kuznetsov Over 39.5 @ -105
ATP: Bachinger @ +305
ATP: Stakhovsky @ +161
WTA: Pironkova +1.5 sets @ -125
WTA: Lucic +1.5 sets @ +150
Either to win one unit or risking one unit
Either to win 0.5 unit or risking one unit
All lines for the tournament I am getting from BetDSI
It's obvious that the colored plays are full strength (dogs to risk 1u/ faves to win 1u)
and you intend the black plays to be weaker plays...
in the past these weaker plays were just as u'd expect (dogs to risk 0.5u/ faves to win 0.5u)
which leads me to suspect that you actually intended:
Either to win one unit or risking one unit
Either to win 0.5 unit or risking 0.5 unit
_________
regardless of whether a correction is due ...adding the words "dog/fave" would help us degen cretins to follow along
Last edited by fitguy67; 08-26-14 at 11:25 AM.
Great start!
Why is it that if the opponent retires from the match, it's considered a No Bet
Sets bets, matches must be completed in full, just like if you bet the total # of games of game spread etc.
Yeah sorry for the typo. Any in gold are risking one unit on dogs or to win one unit on faves.
Black are the same set-up, but for 0.5 unit
Sucks when the outcome wouldn't have changed regardless if it was completed or not.
Yep, Sock screwed me today. Andujar +6 was my largest bet of the day (well aside from Kei, but that was easy money).
Add...
WTA: Gajdosova +1.5 sets @ +105
*1.0 unit play
