lopez will not proceed to lose
lopez will not proceed to lose
ok GGL nice job. makes it interesting as usual.
Did you confuse my bet on Garcia with Garcia-Lopez Geno??
Very rarely do I make such mistakes so assume it's you who are mistaken if something doesn't give, but feel free to ask by all means!
Also, please refer to this thread for random comments or spam:
http://www.sportsbookreview.com/forum/tennis-bet...l#post21617270
no i did not, i bet on GGL. And sorry, i got your two threads confused. will only use this one to discuss and find your picks. cheers.
where can you see the public bets for tennis?
i'd suggest "set1" as a crystal clear yet still efficient rendering of what you now designate as "1:st"
it could even be shortened to just s1 (a i do on my spreadsheets)...but idiots will always be idiots and ask without even thinking,
set1, in contrast is completely unambiguous...yet requires exactly the same number of keystrokes as your current notation, which never fails to trigger questions from newcomers...i'd hate to see you wasting more keystrokes than necessary each and every time you put on a set1 bet
"Occam's Razor" Rules
Last edited by fitguy67; 04-11-14 at 01:21 PM.
Thanks for the tip on Garbagelles, HC.
PS I see that you are getting a bit frustrated by the increase in random posts in your thread. That is the price you have to pay for being the best tennis capper right now. Keep it up, HC.
PPS I do not get all the discussion of 1st vs set1. If you do not get that in the first place, you probably should not be tailing anybody.
Last edited by frugalgambler; 04-11-14 at 02:22 PM.
That's a good point actually... damn good!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ImeQVhu5FCM&t=4m15s
Almagro -4.5 @ 2.32 – 4 units (Pinnacle)
KEXX
KEXX
KEXX
FUXX
KEXX
KEXX
FUXX
Total hits: 195
Total mishits: 254
Total stake: 2049u
Net yield: +193.267u
ROI: +9.43% (rounded)
Pending:
Almagro -4.5 @ 2.32 – 4 units (Pinnacle)
i do not/did not propose changing your current "1:st" notation...it's always been fine with me
(Occam's Razor= if it ain't broke...no need to fix it)
YOU suggested you'd make an effort to change it to "1:st set" to somehow "fix it" for those who continue to be confused...i simply presented "set1" as an easier alternative to that, if you felt you must do something...
(Occam's Razor = if you decide to change something for some reason, opt for the simplest change that works...subject to the dictates of your own "style", of course)
_______
carry on as you see fit...and keep peeling off those plays from your amazing deck of better-than+5%ROI cards
Last edited by fitguy67; 04-12-14 at 01:03 AM.