SIA form- I hope this works-
SIA Liability Claim form name issue.docThe sbr site would not allow me to copy and paste to the current thread. but starting a new topic, you can attach forms. If this doesnt work, then I am sorry. But look at the form if it did work and look at what these scam artist did and what justin is covering up.
now what do you *********** who didnt believe me think? amazing isnt it? you trust justin over me because he posts like he is a good guy. He is a fraud.
now SIA ****ing pay me you god damn scam outlet!
From reading Justin's coherent replies to your many, many attacking messages, the point seems to be that, at the time the "wife" deposited, she claimed that the debit/credit card she was using was hers and did not - despite what you previously claimed when I specifically asked you about it - either ask or receive approval for depositing via a third party account.
No third party authorisation can undo that. Hence why Justin is saying that this form is irrelevant. And if the "wife" did indeed deposit claiming the card was hers, it's fraud. You and your "wife", or you and your husband, committed fraud vis-a-vis your bank. End of.
Right now, I'm not sure if you understand this and are attempting to be obtuse to the fraud you committed and why the book justifiably won't pay you, or whether you really don't understand what you did wrong. If the latter, I hope the above clarifies this for you.
Last edited by AimingHigh; 07-01-09 at 09:05 AM. Reason: Typos.
Is there an archived copy of the TOS that indicates when the ability to make 3rd party deposits (i.e. use of this form) was revoked as SIA state?
wrong again -
if you read the posts you will see where kathleen told melissa to write her name over mine to make the withdrawel go by faster. kyle also told her to darken and write in the number better so they can see it.
then joseph said to send it normal. its not fraud you idiot. doing what was told. just like when melissa called to talk about signing up.
she explained then that her deposits would be from someone else until her new card comes in the mail. they were aware-
if you lose, they keep the money - if you win, they refund you and think of a way to not pay you.
simple case. stop being ignorant.
Originally Posted by AimingHigh
From reading Justin's coherent replies to your many, many attacking messages, the point seems to be that, at the time the "wife" deposited, she claimed that the debit/credit card she was using was hers and did not - despite what you previously claimed when I specifically asked you about it - either ask or receive approval for depositing via a third party account.
No third party authorisation can undo that. Hence why Justin is saying that this form is irrelevant. And if the "wife" did indeed deposit claiming the card was hers, it's fraud. You and your "wife", or you and your husband, committed fraud vis-a-vis your bank. End of.
Right now, I'm not sure if you understand this and are attempting to be obtuse to the fraud you committed and why the book justifiably won't pay you, or whether you really don't understand what you did wrong. If the latter, I hope the above clarifies this for you.
So a sportsbook told you to commit fraud? Do you have any proof of this?
yep - all conversations are recorded over there.
also call Kathleen and Kyle and Joseph and ask them yourself. Lets see how much honor they have.
I am the only 1 providing proof. havent you realized that? you ignore all of that and just run your mouth to defend justin, a con artist.
And it would still be fraud, even if SIA told you to do it - which I don't for a second believe they did. The fraud is you 'vs' the bank, and what an external party did/didn't tell you to do is totally irrelevant to that.
So you have nothing in writing? No e-mailed proof despite your fondness for e-mails and messaging?
If someone was asking me to commit fraud, I'd certainly want it in writing.
then have me arrested if its fraud. you dumb (*snip*).
they told me too, they have the tapes- they have the proof.
I even provided you the email that shows to not cross out the names but just send the hubands info.
dont be such a jerkoff.
Last edited by Justin7; 07-01-09 at 09:58 AM.
Resorting to rudeness doesn't help your claim. No proof = no claim. No credibility = no hope in the absence of definitive proof.I suggest you go ask another forum to help you as you've lost all credibility here.
/Done.
[quote=AimingHigh;1988033]Resorting to rudeness doesn't help your claim. No proof = no claim. No credibility = no hope in the absence of definitive proof.I suggest you go ask another forum to help you as you've lost all credibility here.
/Done
We'll said
lost it for you? others believe me.
I have plenty of emails from folks.
now lets see no proof=???? sent and copied the emails and forms you guys requested. what do you mean no proof? no credibility? you think you and justin have that? you 2 *snip* just let a book steal from someon. aiming high, how long have you worked for SIA?
Last edited by Justin7; 07-01-09 at 10:02 AM.
FBI notified!
lost it for you? others believe me.
I have plenty of emails from folks.
now lets see no proof=???? sent and copied the emails and forms you guys requested. what do you mean no proof? no credibility? you think you and justin have that? you 2 oysters just let a book steal from someon. aiming high, how long have you worked for SIA?
You do realise that if you continue to abuse people on this forum, you'll be banned. Why speak so harshly towards people, as I said, it gets you nowhere. People may be disagreeing with you but that doesen't give you the write to insult them.
You're best off just moving onto another subject before you get banned.
