Corey up to no good again, this time at Heritage. Hits 2 Royals and is owed 43K

Originally Posted by BigDaddy

you can't make this shit up.

Cory appears to be making some of it up. In some of the 'pasted' emails, his mom's address is h@yahoo.com; in another it is hh@yahoo.com.

Originally Posted by cory1111

From: Helena H [mailto:h@yahoo.com]
Sent: Wednesday, July 04, 2012 7:02 AM
To: John
Subject: 84730


Tell me John,
Do I have to lose 50k before I win one dollar? Just look how many deposits and not one dollar has been won? You think this if fair?
Helena
84730

Originally Posted by cory1111

From: Helena H [mailto:hh@yahoo.com]
Sent: Wednesday, July 04, 2012 7:28 AM
To: Heritage Sales
Subject: Re: 84730


Hi John,
I just want a chance to win, and obviously thats not happening. And if its at 6% isnt something wrong then? But no I dont want the casino closed, I put a lot of money in it and should be able to win something.
thanks,
Helena.

I think Cory should be paid; I just found it amusing.

To lazy to go back and read.

Has SBR commented on if they did fund the Cory vs EZ/RX lawsuit?

Originally Posted by jgilmartin

Cory appears to be making some of it up. In some of the 'pasted' emails, his mom's address is h@yahoo.com; in another it is hh@yahoo.com.


I think Cory should be paid; I just found it amusing.

I think he is just editing out the email address. Her name appears to be Helena H..so he probably left h from one email, and hh from another.

Originally Posted by cloverfield

I think he is just editing out the email address. Her name appears to be Helena H..so he probably left h from one email, and hh from another.

Yes, possibly. Why would you not just edit out the whole address, though, unless you wanted it to look like you directly pasted emails? Regardless, it has no bearing on the case at all.

Originally Posted by boatboatboat

To lazy to go back and read.

Has SBR commented on if they did fund the Cory vs EZ/RX lawsuit?

No, they are eerily quiet on the subject. Consequently, we should adopt the same stance Justin took in this case: If one side refuses to provide requested info, a default judgment should be made. SBR apparently did fund Cory's lawsuit, and gave him an unprecedented free soapbox for his cause. It also calls into question the supposedly unbiased video J7 made as SBR had a clear bias in the matter from the onset.

Maybe they haven't commented because they dont even know Cory has said they funded the lawsuit. I haven't read an official SBR post in this thread for quite awhile.

For all we know, they aren't even reading. And who could blame them...........

Maybe someone should create a thread and ask them directly. If it isn't true, I would think they would appreciate the chance to set the record straight, and if it is true, there might very well a good reason they funded the lawsuit, that we are unaware of.

Why is this such a big issue for for you Hedge?

SBR is a player advocate site. Isn't it good that they would help fund a legal action for a member?

You might read all sorts of evil intent into it, but how do you know they haven't done this for others? Or wouldn't do it for you in a case they felt a book had stolen 40k from you?

Not speaking for Hedge, but speaking for my self, it seems odd that one gambling forum funds a lawsuit to take control of another forums URL.

Not sure what that does to "protect" the player.

Originally Posted by boatboatboat

Not speaking for Hedge, but speaking for my self, it seems odd that one gambling forum funds a lawsuit to take control of another forums URL.

Not sure what that does to "protect" the player.

I did not know about that part. Thought it was simply to get Cory's winnings.

Either way, I like the idea that if I ever get put in that sort of spot SBR might pony up the funds to pursue it.

you really think SBR will come to your rescue?

COME ON MAN!!!

This isn't about protecting players.

never has been, never will be.

It's about the fourm getting $ , it always has been.

Same thing is true at the rx, covers, any of the fourms.

Anytime you click on a books link at the top and make a deposit, SBR gets a slice of the pie.

MAKE IT RAIN BABY!! MAAKE IT RAIN!

Naive, to think other wise.

I'm not naive. I see they could have had personal reasons for wanting to give extra help. I don't have a problem with that.

And I also have zero problem with SBR making money. In fact, the more the better. I like what they do it with it.

Actually, it blows me away that so many from the land of capitalism seem to have an issue with SBR being a profit making business.

Originally Posted by Optional

Why is this such a big issue for for you Hedge?

SBR is a player advocate site. Isn't it good that they would help fund a legal action for a member?

You might read all sorts of evil intent into it, but how do you know they haven't done this for others? Or wouldn't do it for you in a case they felt a book had stolen 40k from you?

No, they used to be a 100% advocate site, now their focus is almost entirely based on making a buck. Just look at BOL's banner and their bought and paid for B+ rating if you have any doubts. Don't for a second think SBR John donated 3k to Cory out of the goodness of his heart--something was required in return. Further, they used that EZ garbage marathon thread as their platform for their hidden agenda and wrapped it around a Justin7 video declaring the righteousness of their cause. I'm glad that Colorado case got thrown out and hope John enjoyed eating that 3 grand losing bet.

The onlything SBR wanted was theRX domain name, that alone is well worth more than any lawyer fee's they possibly paid out to go after it. Sbr has lost all credibility with how everything keeps coming to fruitation. If you had any doubt with how they mask the BetOnline issues, after this dispute they tried to keep quiet its done nothing but backfire in their face. I rather go to bat vs a book alone than ask SBR to arbitrate any dispute that possibly has a sponsor involved. You cant fault a forum for trying to make money, but dont do it with the knife stuck in the front of your posters, at least keep it hidden in their back

Originally Posted by Optional

I'm not naive. I see they could have had personal reasons for wanting to give extra help. I don't have a problem with that.

And I also have zero problem with SBR making money. In fact, the more the better. I like what they do it with it.

Actually, it blows me away that so many from the land of capitalism seem to have an issue with SBR being a profit making business.

Absolutely nothing wrong with making money, but how you earn it is another story. Case in point: Passing off Betonline as a "Recommended Book" is disgraceful. People have been waiting months to collect their winnings, but SBR's ad check seems to arrive on time regularly.

This is why I believe Justin7/SBR have no business deciding a case involving a sponsor, regardless if the decision appears fair. SBR loyalties are more driven by profit than player protection these days. That is a fact, albeit a sad one.

Originally Posted by boatboatboat

Maybe they haven't commented because they dont even know Cory has said they funded the lawsuit. I haven't read an official SBR post in this thread for quite awhile.

For all we know, they aren't even reading. And who could blame them...........

Maybe someone should create a thread and ask them directly. If it isn't true, I would think they would appreciate the chance to set the record straight, and if it is true, there might very well a good reason they funded the lawsuit, that we are unaware of.

Extremely doubtful. The Mods' jobs are to monitor threads, especially inflamed ones like this. SBR reps are certainly reading this thread, but have elected to not respond the past 2+ days.