Login Search

Crime in America.

Last Post
#766

Default

Quote Originally Posted by DwightShrute View Post
what has he lied about?
This may not fall under the lie department but the POS department,
He was subpoenaed by congress and would not show up. As soon as the GOP gained control of the house, he said ''we will have investigations now, with the power of subpoena and if you don't testify, we will put you in jail.'' When he just a few months before had done just that, why should it be any different for him.
#767

Default

Quote Originally Posted by jackpot269 View Post
This may not fall under the lie department but the POS department,
He was subpoenaed by congress and would not show up. As soon as the GOP gained control of the house, he said ''we will have investigations now, with the power of subpoena and if you don't testify, we will put you in jail.'' When he just a few months before had done just that, why should it be any different for him.
was he subpoenaed by congress or was it the sham J6 committee?

you don't think he makes any sense in the following? ...

“You have not explained the Constitutional basis for the extraordinary claim that a congressional committee may compel the testimony of other Members of Congress,” Jordan wrote in one instance.

He referred to the panel’s subpoena of him as “a dangerous escalation of House Democrats’ pursuit of political vendettas” and accused committee members of leading a partisan investigation that is not designed to seek the truth but instead to settle political scores, specifically with former President Donald Trump.

“Public statements by members of the Select Committee indicate that it seeks to use its subpoena authority for improper motives and for the self-aggrandizement of its members,” Jordan wrote.

He argued that his subpoena is not constitutional or valid because he claims he has “no relevant” information that would advance the committee’s investigation.
#768

Default

Quote Originally Posted by DwightShrute View Post
but that isn't really true now is it? Or were you being sarcastic?
So, you think most post are honest, and straightforward?

Even if most are not lies, information is conventionally left out a lot.

Another example, take your pick on someone rich or powerful that has been accused of more than one sexual misconduct, if one of the accusers is found to be a fraud, then that means they all are. Of course, that is not the case, one doesn't say anything about the others. But time and time again that what is pushed. Same about a lot of other things that is claimed was a lie or made up, if one aspect is proven wrong it is pushed that all of it is, weather it has been or not.
#769

Default

Quote Originally Posted by DwightShrute View Post
was he subpoenaed by congress or was it the sham J6 committee?

you don't think he makes any sense in the following? ...

“You have not explained the Constitutional basis for the extraordinary claim that a congressional committee may compel the testimony of other Members of Congress,” Jordan wrote in one instance.

He referred to the panel’s subpoena of him as “a dangerous escalation of House Democrats’ pursuit of political vendettas” and accused committee members of leading a partisan investigation that is not designed to seek the truth but instead to settle political scores, specifically with former President Donald Trump.

“Public statements by members of the Select Committee indicate that it seeks to use its subpoena authority for improper motives and for the self-aggrandizement of its members,” Jordan wrote.

He argued that his subpoena is not constitutional or valid because he claims he has “no relevant” information that would advance the committee’s investigation.
its the same thing a congressional subpoena. His was the same.


Well, everyone that gets one should say what he did. No one would ever have to testify. It should not be his decision.
#770

Default

Quote Originally Posted by jackpot269 View Post
So, you think most post are honest, and straightforward?

Even if most are not lies, information is conventionally left out a lot.

Another example, take your pick on someone rich or powerful that has been accused of more than one sexual misconduct, if one of the accusers is found to be a fraud, then that means they all are. Of course, that is not the case, one doesn't say anything about the others. But time and time again that what is pushed. Same about a lot of other things that is claimed was a lie or made up, if one aspect is proven wrong it is pushed that all of it is, weather it has been or not.
I share my thoughts to show the people who already think like me that they are not alone. Those that think like me have proven themselves repeatedly as being honest and straightforward. We do our homework. How many examples must I show of the dishonestly, lies by omission, false narratives, and outright lies on this forum from, almost exclusively, the Left? Here's the difference, if a conservative voice on the forum was posting the same amount of non-stop lies like a Hareeballs does, we would call him out. You guys won't. You would rather let the continuous lies continue.

Here is proof. There obviously was no insurrection on J6. It was a lawful gathering where a few idiots rioted. Yet the government over stepped it authority by arresting hundreds of people just for being there and not engaging in any violence whatsoever. A 20 year sentence for trespassing? You could kill someone and get less time in prison. The far Left will refuse to admit this is wrong but reasonable people know it is. The NY case being help right now. This is a joke. There is no case. Yet Trump is facing more years behind bars than if you you got supper drunk, got in your car, and crashed into a mini van killing an entire family.
Accused/accusers are the key words aren't they? Do you believe that people in power and/or Rich people are sometimes targeted by those looking to make a buck? Of course you do.
#776

Default

Quote Originally Posted by Foxx View Post
This was a solid ongoing thread, but some of you guys are doing of hell of job of derailing it with your incessant political grumbling. Come on guys, make the Crime thread great again.
True. Old Bill doesn't care where he spews his Trump Hate. I was going to say something, but thought better of it. It's just old bill who the mods feel sorry for and let him rant and rave about all his acrimony.
#779
#780

Default

Quote Originally Posted by slewfan View Post
True. Old Bill doesn't care where he spews his Trump Hate. I was going to say something, but thought better of it. It's just old bill who the mods feel sorry for and let him rant and rave about all his acrimony.
Old Bill is a good reminder of what not to do.