Login Search

What the Hell is going on in Ferguson, Missouri?

Last Post
#586

Default

I think Shari deserves to give everyone in this thread an apology for her bs earlier. All they "witnesses" lied. Brown wasnt shot in the back. He was shot 6 times, 4 in the arm, and twice in the face. All from the front. Everything the cop says is proving to be true. All the ghetto niggs are proving to be just that - niggs.
Give Points

Points Awarded:

retard gave Plaza23 2 Betpoint(s) for this post.

#587

Default

Quote Originally Posted by The Kraken View Post
What you fail to realize is whether you agree with the tactics or not, the "pure thuggery" keeps this story in the news 24/7 right now. Without all the rioting, this wouldn't even be a story.

This puts immense pressure on politicians to make sure something like this doesn't happen again.

So in a way, the thuggery is about Mile Brown. And it will end up bad for the officer.

He will be charged with second degree manslaughter
That officer wont be charged with anything. And he shouldnt be.
#588

Default

Where is kidcudi and that shari91 now? Shari91 was saying in essence people here were small minded and since she was on social media talking to the locals, she somehow was not small minded.
I guess your peeps on social media lied to you Shari. Say it isn't so, the witnesses were not biased.
when will some learn?
#594

Default

Apparently this autopsy is the one done BY Baden that was brought in by Crump and the family.....also states shots were not fired at point blank or close range....and now Crump releases a statement saying 'the scattering of the bullets shows a blatant disregard for the public the officer was supposed to be protecting"


What happened to 'mike was executed at point blank range, on his knees, unloaded on' Mr Crump you racist lying motherfukker

Crump, Sharpton, Jackson ALL need to be charged with slander, libel, inciting these riots.....and sent a bill for all the police overtime and damage to property in Ferguson. Unreal these assholes.
#596

Default

Quote Originally Posted by itchypickle View Post
Apparently this autopsy is the one done BY Baden that was brought in by Crump and the family.....also states shots were not fired at point blank or close range....and now Crump releases a statement saying 'the scattering of the bullets shows a blatant disregard for the public the officer was supposed to be protecting"


What happened to 'mike was executed at point blank range, on his knees, unloaded on' Mr Crump you racist lying motherfukker

Crump, Sharpton, Jackson ALL need to be charged with slander, libel, inciting these riots.....and sent a bill for all the police overtime and damage to property in Ferguson. Unreal these assholes.
There is an exit or entry wound on his right hand and they are saying this must have happened when he had his hands in the air surrendering. Crump said that Mike brown was shot in the back of the arm despite no entry wounds to the back of the arm.
#597

Default

The fact that no shots entered the back is actually close to irrelevant.

Here are a few relevant facts.

Brown was unarmed. He was shot six times. There was enough distance between Brown and the cop that no gunpowder was found on the body. What threat did Brown present for the officer to fear for his life or the life of another? No weapon and not close enough to leave GSR on Browns body.

What the female eye witness said was "after that, he was running away and the officer shot. He jerked LIKE he was hit in the back. He then turned around and put his hands in the air".

Now, given this statement, it could still be 100% accurate. It's perfectly reasonable to conceive Brown "jerking" as the shot was fired, even though he wasn't shot. Maybe out of surprise or fear or whatever. I'd probably do the same. If all you heard was the shot and saw him jerk, it's easy to see why the eye witness thought he was shot in the back.

The cop still proceeded to shoot him six more times. An unarmed man that was just running away.

Like it or lot, this cop is going to prison.

100% lock
Last edited by The Kraken; 08-17-14 at 11:51 PM.
#598

Default

Quote Originally Posted by The Kraken View Post
The fact that no shots entered the back is actually close to irrelevant.


It discredits the main witness's recount of the incident.

So you think the cop fired a warning shot so that he could get the guy to stop so he could kill him execution style? Makes no sense.
#599

Default

Quote Originally Posted by The Kraken View Post
The fact that no shots entered the back is actually close to irrelevant.

Here are a few relevant facts.

Brown was unarmed. He was shot six times. There was enough distance between Brown and the cop that no gunpowder was found on the body. What threat did Brown present for the officer to fear for his life or the life of another? No weapon and not close enough to leave GSR on Browns body.

What the female eye witness said was "after that, he was running away and the officer shot. He jerked LIKE he was hit in the back. He then turned around and put his hands in the air".

Now, given this statement, it could still be 100% accurate. It's perfectly reasonable to conceive Brown "jerking" as the shot was fired. Maybe out of surprise or fear or whatever. If all you heard was the shot and saw him jerk, it's easy to see why the eye witness thought he was shot in the back.

The cop still proceeded to shoot him six more times. An unarmed man that was just running away.

Like it or lot, this cop is going to prison.
I dont understand whats hard to understand about this. Also the cop could have shot at him from behind and missed which got those statements. Unloading a full clip on an unarmed person is insane to me.