Rodgers to Titans?
apparently he's building a home in a Nashville suburb
Tannehill was LaFleur's QB when LaFleur was OC of the Titans, so there's some familiarity there
Titans would also have to send two 1st rounders
is this a more realistic landing spot than Denver or Pittsburgh, or do none stand a chance?
Hmmm
I mean if he wants to win now and I’m sure he does, the Titans would make more sense than Denver or Pittsburgh.
It depends on what kind of moves those other teams would be willing to make to get whatever Rodgers wants a la the Buccs with Brady. But you could argue the Buccs had enough requisite talent there already but just needed the edges rounded off so to speak. I don’t really think the Broncos or Steelers are in a spot where they’re just a good qb away. Titans are pretty loaded right now
Good one, Orby. I have to admit that's not bad.
Would GBay salary cap shake out OK?
Any fire on Rodgers to San Fran? Surely the young QB can still sit for two years. Garoppolo plus picks would seem like a fair deal.
At SF, Rodgers could stay in the NFC. And stay away from some of the young AFC qbs.
Hea building home there cause hes not vaccinated
He's going to stay in green bay is my guess. I say this every year though.
He's definitely a 10X better QB than Tannehill... major upgrade.
Originally Posted by TheMoneyShot
He's definitely a 10X better QB than Tannehill... major upgrade.
Would be nice to just be able to hand the ball to Henry and always have a defense keep you in any game.
I doubt itHe's going to stay in green bay is my guess. I say this every year though.
He loves drama
He is for the next 1-2 seasons. Beyond that, who knows at 40+.He's definitely a 10X better QB than Tannehill... major upgrade.
I'm not sure about that. All 3 of those teams(as well as a few others) would be really good with Rodgers at the helm. I'd argue that Denver and Pitt would be a great landing spot for any good QB. They both have good defense and some nice young skill players.I mean if he wants to win now and I’m sure he does, the Titans would make more sense than Denver or Pittsburgh.
It depends on what kind of moves those other teams would be willing to make to get whatever Rodgers wants a la the Buccs with Brady. But you could argue the Buccs had enough requisite talent there already but just needed the edges rounded off so to speak. I don’t really think the Broncos or Steelers are in a spot where they’re just a good qb away. Titans are pretty loaded right now
He has multiple homes, it means nothing. If Rodgers left Green Bay it would be for the perfect team and a contender, not the Titans.apparently he's building a home in a Nashville suburb
Tannehill was LaFleur's QB when LaFleur was OC of the Titans, so there's some familiarity there
Titans would also have to send two 1st rounders
is this a more realistic landing spot than Denver or Pittsburgh, or do none stand a chance?
Pittsburgh has no offensive line and Denver plays in the toughest division in football. Neither team would be remotely appealing to Rodgers.I'm not sure about that. All 3 of those teams(as well as a few others) would be really good with Rodgers at the helm. I'd argue that Denver and Pitt would be a great landing spot for any good QB. They both have good defense and some nice young skill players.
The age difference between the 2 is roughly 5 years. I'd take Rodgers statistically and also awareness wise over Tannehill for their remaining playing careers. There's no comparison.He is for the next 1-2 seasons. Beyond that, who knows at 40+.
Tannehill straight up lost the game for Tennessee. He was trash with Miami... he's trash with Tennessee.
I'd take Rodgers in a wheelchair over Tannehill.
