I played a +4.5 Teaser
New York Jets +7½
New York Jets/Cleveland Browns Under 44½ *
1 pays 1.07
Good luck
Ask any jet fan - they should have won 9 games last year - got jobbed by a remarkable TD overturn that gave Pats a win. Means nothing.Originally Posted by Mac4Lyfe
Brown's should have won 6 games last year. Kizer blew 4 games with WTF red zone turnovers and Hue blew 2 with clock mismanagement. Hue is still mishandling the clock but the team is much improved. I expect the team to come out with their hair on fire and treat this game like a playoff. Browns run defense has been top 10 the last few years, so that's not a fluke. Now they have a solid secondary too. Great spot to release the bud...
Jets execute a little better than week 2 they win this game by 10 or more.
1-1-32 included last 2 seasons, enough said. Gut says Browns win by 3 or less though.
I'm personally more excited to see CHI @ ARZ. Only game that might be better than this one.
I was merely pointing out that for all the people who keep saying that the Browns were 0-16 last year that they were actually better than their winless record showed. They were clearly tanking. I'm still not sure if Hue was screwing up, mismanaging games on purpose but he's a weak link for sure.Ask any jet fan - they should have won 9 games last year - got jobbed by a remarkable TD overturn that gave Pats a win. Means nothing.
Jets execute a little better than week 2 they win this game by 10 or more.
I like the Browns
So after going 3-13 (2015) and then 1-15 (2016), the Browns masterminded a campaign of intentionally going 0-16?for all the people who keep saying that the Browns were 0-16 last year that they were actually better than their winless record showed. They were clearly tanking.
These dividends paying off are still not reflected in the win column.
Bud light makes millions for every browns lost - amazing idea - People will keep mentioning bud light for each browns lost- once they win ? Bud lights go away
The consensus numbers are scary on this game especially if you are backing the Browns.
Yep, the front office was intent on tanking last year. They could have had their franchise QB a year early in Wentz or Watson or Mahomes but they chose to wait another year. Hue even mentioned that he was paid to LOSE games, insinuating that the front office wanted him to tank.So after going 3-13 (2015) and then 1-15 (2016), the Browns masterminded a campaign of intentionally going 0-16?
These dividends paying off are still not reflected in the win column.
I always assume thurs night games favor offense...or like i said "wild" nonsense (turnovers, def tds, 75+ plays) i dont trust Hue to coach his way out of a close game where the jets dont cover 10 and i like one team to break 20lol what? Why would you think of this as a wild offensive game?
Both teams struggle offensively. Jets D won’t know all the Brown’s plays, but Browns actually have a good D this year. I doubt either team breaks 350 total offensive yards. You got a rookie QB on the road on a short week and a Tyrod Taylor with a short WR group off back to back heartbreak losses due to shitty kicker. TNF games typically struggle offensively anyways.
To me, this game screams 20-13 Browns, or worse, 16-13 Browns.
dunno i will prob take more bets on props if anything
StopYep, the front office was intent on tanking last year. They could have had their franchise QB a year early in Wentz or Watson or Mahomes but they chose to wait another year. Hue even mentioned that he was paid to LOSE games, insinuating that the front office wanted him to tank.
I just put a sizable bet on the Browns -2 the first half. The Jets are a pretty good team that may win this game but I've got to think the Browns are going to be on fire to start this game. The Browns have been a good 1st half team, even when they went winless last year. They seem to get off to great starts
Huh? Do you follow the Browns? It is well documented. A simple Google search...Stop
Did the Browns set up a winless QB room to tank, or were they just stupid?
Jan 2, 2018
Tony GrossiESPN Cleveland
People believe that Brown and DePodesta were in agreement that a veteran-free quarterback room would serve the purpose of assuring the Browns of winning as few games as possible and heightening the team’s draft position in 2018. Thus, the plan they put into action – tanking, in essence – worked to perfection. Instead of fixing the system that produced such a misguided decision, Haslam merely picked one scapegoat and replaced him. And so it goes.
Just throwing this out there. I know the numbers are not spot on, but decent indicator of where the public is leaning.
TNF
Week 1 63% on ATL (L)
Week 2 65% on BAL (L)
Week 3 64% on CLE (So far)
the under has shifted a lot today...seems like the world is on the under
expect some rogue flags to put more points on the board!
