Login Search

Nash's 2014 All things MLB Talking Baseball Thread

Last Post
#1261

Default What Vegas is trying to say here is.....

We are giving you + money if you bet the under and you are getting two of the best under 25 year old AL pitchers.
Come on, it's free money, there can't possibly be more than 8 runs with these two hurlers.

Oakland Athletics at Texas Rangers
Mon 4/28 911 Oakland Athletics S Gray - R +116 o3˝ -125 u3˝ +105
8:05PM 912 Texas Rangers Y Darvish - R -126 o4 -105 u4 -115


Uh,uh, not biting.
#1262

Default

Quote Originally Posted by stevenash View Post
We are giving you + money if you bet the under and you are getting two of the best under 25 year old AL pitchers.
Come on, it's free money, there can't possibly be more than 8 runs with these two hurlers.

<small>Oakland Athletics at Texas Rangers</small>
Mon 4/28 911 Oakland Athletics S Gray - R <input id="editx" name="S1_25" size="4" style="font-size: 1em; color: rgb(68, 68, 68);"> <select id="altS1_25" name="altS1_25" style="font-size: 1em; color: rgb(68, 68, 68);"><option value="0" selected="">+1˝ -175</option><option value="1">+2˝ -300</option><option value="2">-1˝ +175</option><option value="3">-2˝ +265</option><option value="4">+1 -130</option></select> <input id="editx" name="M1_25" size="4" style="font-size: 1em; color: rgb(68, 68, 68);"> +116 <input id="editx" name="L1_25" size="4" style="font-size: 1em; color: rgb(68, 68, 68);"> <select id="altL1_25" name="altL1_25" style="font-size: 1em; color: rgb(68, 68, 68);"><option value="0" selected="">o7˝ -125</option><option value="1">o8 -107</option><option value="2">o7 -160</option><option value="3">o8˝ +115</option><option value="4">o6˝ -200</option></select> <input id="editx" name="E1_25" size="4" style="font-size: 1em; color: rgb(68, 68, 68);"> o3˝ -125 <input id="editx" name="E3_25" size="4" style="font-size: 1em; color: rgb(68, 68, 68);"> u3˝ +105
8:05PM 912 Texas Rangers Y Darvish - R <input id="editx" name="S2_25" size="4" style="font-size: 1em; color: rgb(68, 68, 68);"> <select id="altS2_25" name="altS2_25" style="font-size: 1em; color: rgb(68, 68, 68);"><option value="0" selected="">-1˝ +155</option><option value="1">-2˝ +250</option><option value="2">+1˝ -210</option><option value="3">+2˝ -325</option><option value="4">-1 +110</option></select> <input id="editx" name="M2_25" size="4" style="font-size: 1em; color: rgb(68, 68, 68);"> -126 <input id="editx" name="L2_25" size="4" style="font-size: 1em; color: rgb(68, 68, 68);"> <select id="altL2_25" name="altL2_25" style="font-size: 1em; color: rgb(68, 68, 68);"><option value="0" selected="">u7˝ +105</option><option value="1">u8 -113</option><option value="2">u7 +140</option><option value="3">u8˝ -135</option><option value="4">u6˝ +170</option></select> <input id="editx" name="E2_25" size="4" style="font-size: 1em; color: rgb(68, 68, 68);"> o4 -105 <input id="editx" name="E4_25" size="4" style="font-size: 1em; color: rgb(68, 68, 68);"> u4 -115


Uh,uh, not biting.
under looking good. wish i would have bet it
#1264

Default

Quote Originally Posted by bettermovefast View Post
Yeah, I'm curious. What was your reasoning for not biting?
b/c the under was + money and he thought there is no way books would offer + money on a under with 2 stud pitchers.

i can def see this reasoning but i feel like in baseball its not fixed so you dont gotta worry about who the public is on or "traps"
#1265

Default

under 7.5 at +ev is where i was at. darvish had a pattern last year of being amazing, followed by just run after run allowed. was hoping his next outing would be the that, it was this one tho. thank the betting gods Rangers couldn't score here. cashed it even tho analysis was a little off, and ready to move on to the next one. im thinking...

Ticket#:2486570
Apr 29 08:05 PM
Apr 29 03:40 AM MLB
STRAIGHT BET
[967] TOTAL o8˝EV (OAK vrs TEX)
( S KAZMIR -L / M PEREZ -L )
10.00 / 10.00
Ticket#:2486571
Apr 29 08:05 PM
Apr 29 03:40 AM MLB
STRAIGHT BET
[968] TEX -113
( ACTION )
11.30 / 10.00
#1267

Default

Quote Originally Posted by miss_sbets View Post
Yay for lengthy write-ups
same thing happened to me in my thread. I was undefeated when i was doing lengthy write ups and then i got lazy and said no time for write ups and i havent won a posted play since.

I think when you do write ups it forces you to really have sound reasoning for making a certain play and the write up re-inforces a bettors confidence in a play.