I don't normally like laying this much chalk but...
Cincinnati Reds -230 tomorrow is a winner. You could play that at -300.
Better add some flair so PT takes me seriously.
I'll take my chances with the +172
You are the reason gamblers lose
ill just parlay the -230 with something else like the mets and watch my money get made
Ask last nights dodger backers how laying over -200 worked
nice picOriginally Posted by Smoke
You are the reason gamblers lose
a) Slowey is a better than .500 lifetime pitcher pitching for crappy Twins teams. His lifetime ERA and WH/IP is at NL league average, and he has a better than league average K/9 pct.Cincinnati Reds -230 tomorrow is a winner. You could play that at -300.
Better add some flair so PT takes me seriously.
b) If you lose this wager, and it could happen, you would have to win your next three consecutive chalky-chalk plays just to get even, and if you don't, your bankroll is crippled.
c) Miami can actually hit Latos, who is a nice starter, but nowhere close to a Verlander, Kershaw, Price, CC.
Hell, he's nowhere close to the Scherzer's of the world.
MIAMI MARLINS CAREER STATISTICS VS. MAT LATOS BATTER AB H 2B 3B HR RBI BB SO AVG OBP SLG OPS Chris Coghlan 7 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 .143 .143 .143 .286 Greg Dobbs 3 1 0 1 0 2 0 0 .333 .333 1.000 1.333 Austin Kearns 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1.000 1.000 1.000 2.000 Casey Kotchman 5 1 0 0 1 3 0 3 .200 .200 .800 1.000 Logan Morrison 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .000 .000 .000 .000 Miguel Olivo 3 2 1 0 1 1 0 1 .667 .667 2.000 2.667 Juan Pierre 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 .000 .500 .000 .500 Placido Polanco 8 3 0 0 0 0 1 1 .375 .444 .375 .819 Justin Ruggiano 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 .250 .250 .250 .500 Donovan Solano 2 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 .000 .000 .000 .000 Giancarlo Stanton 5 4 1 0 0 3 2 0 .800 .857 1.000 1.857 Totals 41 14 2 1 2 10 4 10 .341 .391 .585 .977
ill just parlay the -230 with something else like the mets and watch my money get made
Saloon this whack thread. Anyone posting threads about laying daily baseball chalk of -230 should be banned or automatically called LAnders for 30 days as punishment.
Hopefully you are betting to win ten dollars.Cincinnati Reds -230 tomorrow is a winner. You could play that at -300.
Better add some flair so PT takes me seriously.
Wouldn't be the end of the world if this was the case. But why would somebody create a thread about laying big time chalk to win $10??Hopefully you are betting to win ten dollars.
ill just parlay the -230 with something else like the mets and watch my money get made
I'm sure he is betting more money (or betpoints) but people like attentionWouldn't be the end of the world if this was the case. But why would somebody create a thread about laying big time chalk to win $10??
Wrong,You are the reason gamblers lose
He is the reason winning gamblers get paid.
Points Awarded:
Frisco gave boeing power 2 SBR Point(s) for this post.
You are the reason gamblers loseb) If you lose this wager, and it could happen, you would have to win your next three consecutive chalky-chalk plays just to get even, and if you don't, your bankroll is crippled.
Actually, I mostly play dogs. Last season I wound up +14.5 units-ish on about 100 plays (3u plays max, I don't do that LakerBoy 1,000 unit airbet shizz.) Did you guys read the thread title? I don't normally lay this much chalk, this one just adds up.
