2-1 +1u
Dbacks certainly showed up.
YTD
115-124-1 -12.09u
2-1 +1u
Dbacks certainly showed up.
YTD
115-124-1 -12.09u
7/27Arizona Diamondbacks (-111) 2.22u 5DimesMinnesota Twins (+135) 2u BookMaker
1-1 +0.48
YTD
116-125-1 -11.61u
7/28
Kansas City Royals (+101) 3u 5Dimes
Tampa Bay Rays -1.5 (+113) 2u 5Dimes
Miami Marlins (+109) 2u 5Dimes
3-1 +5.21u
YTD
119-126-1 -6.4u
Niņo I bet if you were playing at low juice shops you might be winning
Still all those bets and not down a lot is like winning
Nice woe work
5dimer is as low juice as you yankee pricks can get your hands on jj
7/29Tampa Bay Rays (-108) 3.24u 5DimesMiami Marlins (-117) 2.34u 5DimesToronto Blue Jays (+150) 5Dimes
Last edited by El Nino; 07-29-13 at 02:40 PM. Reason: Format was off
Yeah, I needed that one! Rasmus saved the day Both teams played poor defensively that game. Line's a little high here and Griffin has pitched a little worse than his record suggests. Jays can steal the first one after A's let down coming off big comeback to bury the Angels for good.
I don't mean to hijack the thread but this has not been my experience at all. I've been able to deposit with my CC (Ontario branch CC/bank) to various sites (poker, sports) for years now. I mostly played poker since the early 2000s and just started sports this past year so I'm betting it's your bank (Royals?), which is notoriously anti-gamble. I got a CC with imperial but toronto is supposedly good too. I have a good longstanding relationship with my local branch so maybe thats the case? But I doubt there is a open policy against all such transactions with the banks I've mentioned, it might be customer based.