kobe-winner
lebron-loser
i thought you said the cavs were deep this year? and you called LA a long shot to repeat now you want their starters?Originally Posted by williams22
Still losing your ass in NBA betting?
Give Lebron the rest of LA's starters and he'd be there too. Just wait until next year.stop with all your excuses your QUEEN loss again, and is a proven playoff choker
, enough with your excuses, where's the ELBOW SURGERY?
LeBron is still young and has a lot to learn - you cannot compare him to a VET like Kobe, be real dudes.
Lebron will probably be better, when it's all said and done. He's still looking for that real sidekick. Maybe he gets paired up with Bosh. Jordan didn't do d1ck without Pippen, and Kobe without Shaq or Gasol. Pippen and Shaq are the top 50 greatest NBA players ever, while Gasol has a chance one day. Mo Williams or Antawn Jamison won't ever crack the top 200.
FvKK Lebron!!KOBE carries teams...
You know if the Lakers wins this Championship, which they will.
He will tie Magic Johnson with 5 NBA Titles in the Lakers organization
Since you struggle to read, let me help you. The title of this thread came from the article I was posting. I never thought of them as a "long shot" though they certainly looked like shit for a good part of the season. The Cavs are deeper but LA's 4 starters not named Kobe are better than the Cavs 4 starters not named Lebron, how difficult is that to understand?i thought you said the cavs were deep this year? and you called LA a long shot to repeat now you want their starters?
You seem very fascinated by your constant fishing comments, I'm guessing you are a teenager, correct? Grow up.
so now you're saying fisher is better than mo williams? you never thought of them as a long shot?every comment that you made on that thread were about LA being soft and whatever, they don't have a switch to flip excuses right? bottomline LAKERS is in the finals while your team isn't even in itSince you struggle to read, let me help you. The title of this thread came from the article I was posting. I never thought of them as a "long shot" though they certainly looked like shit for a good part of the season. The Cavs are deeper but LA's 4 starters not named Kobe are better than the Cavs 4 starters not named Lebron, how difficult is that to understand?
You seem very fascinated by your constant fishing comments, I'm guessing you are a teenager, correct? Grow up.
well, if u think about it, the lakers beat a bunch of soft teams to get to the finalsso now you're saying fisher is better than mo williams? you never thought of them as a long shot?every comment that you made on that thread were about LA being soft and whatever, they don't have a switch to flip excuses right? bottomline LAKERS is in the finals while your team isn't even in it
their toughest challenge was from the thunder .......
we'll see how it goes with boston
we'll see about that, what will you say if ever they beat boston?well, if u think about it, the lakers beat a bunch of soft teams to get to the finals
their toughest challenge was from the thunder .......
we'll see how it goes with boston
Kobe over LeBron, not even a question. Much better leader and shown in the playoffs AGAIN.
