Don't do too good in general.Originally Posted by labones00
Raptors coming off a long break, any info on teams with an equal layoff and how they perform ?
AD and rest>3 and WP>60 and p:L
AD and rest>3 and WP>60 and p:L and conference=Eastern
SU: 7-13 (-7.50, 35.0%) ATS: 7-13-0 (-2.75, 35.0%) avg line: 4.8 O/U: 8-11-1 (-1.10, 42.1%) avg total: 194.3
Last edited by dmitean; 12-27-14 at 02:14 PM.
^...watch those links demitean..mods don't like them. Just letting you know.
Here is one I won with SH under today in NCAAB...just wanted to share in case anyone wanted to view.. cheers.
149>=total >= 140 and tS(L, N=5) = 4 and WP <= 20 and o:WP > 50 and 2007<= season
Play under a terrible team losers of 4 of last 5 playing a winning team.
I know the NCAAB db is in beta testing, but I still like to play around with it.
Thanks for the heads up - edited^...watch those links demitean..mods don't like them. Just letting you know.
NBA SDQL 'BEST BET' 2014-15
12/27/14 13:35pm pst Reduced Basketball 520 Golden State Warriors -17½ -105* vs Minnesota Timberwolves
SDQL:
playoffs=0 and season > 2011 and game number > 7 and tA(FGM + TPM*0.5)/tA(FGA) > .467 and oA(o:points in the paint) > 47 and rest < 3 and day!=Wednesday and team not in [Nuggets,Jazz,Wizards,Celtics,Magic,Laker s]
SDQL: English
Since 2011 and excluding the playoffs, and after 7 games into the season, and if it isn't Wednesday, if the team has not had more than 2 days rest, and if the team is not in a short list of squirrel teams that have no concept of the meaning of consistency, play the team that has an average effective field goal percentage of more than .467 when it plays against a team that on average allows its opponents to score more than 47 points in the paint.
NBA Best Bet
12/27/14 5:00 PM EST
Golden St/Minnesota Over 216 -102 (5dimes)
HF and p:quarter scores p:P4 <= 16 and line <= -8.5 and season >= 2009
SU: 81-22 (8.72, 78.6%)
ATS: 41-58-4 (-2.11, 41.4%) avg line: -10.8
O/U: 70-32-1 (4.84, 68.6%) avg total: 196.2
Play the Over when the large home favorite scored 16 or fewer points in the 4th quarter of their previous game.
NBA Best Bet
12/27/14 5:00 PM EST
Golden St/Minnesota Over 216 -102 (5dimes)
HF and p:quarter scores p:P4 <= 16 and line <= -8.5 and season >= 2009
SU: 81-22 (8.72, 78.6%)
ATS: 41-58-4 (-2.11, 41.4%) avg line: -10.8
O/U: 70-32-1 (4.84, 68.6%) avg total: 196.2
Play the Over when the large home favorite scored 16 or fewer points in the 4th quarter of their previous game.
I'm in the under here...so may want to buy out but getting an error on your query? You may have to put some spaces in.
Thanks jmon, for getting me off to a good start today and winning me a few bucks!NBA SDQL Best Bet
l12-27-14 - 12:25p CT
Living on the edge with this on...Play LAC UN 214 -110
SDQL: total >212 and p:W and p:margin >= 10 and opoints + opo
play over a total over 212, a team on one days rest off a win of 10 or more; against an opt of b2b games where 215 or more total points were put up.
SDQL: total >= 210 and pu margin <= -24 and 75 >= WP >= 60 and o:WP > 50
play over a total of 210 or more, a solid team who went under their previous game by 24 or more; playing a winning team.
That's weird. I just copy pasted from their output but realized they put p:quarter scores which brings up the error. So the query should just be:I'm in the under here...so may want to buy out but getting an error on your query? You may have to put some spaces in.
HF and p:P4 <= 16 and line <= -8.5 and season >= 2009
But why are you on the under?
damn..I just realized my english translation on the over.. but my play the under, hope I didn't penetrate any one up.. sorry. :banghead:NBA SDQL Best Bet
l12-27-14 - 12:25p CT
Living on the edge with this on...Play LAC UN 214 -110
SDQL: total >212 and p:W and p:margin >= 10 and op:points + opo:points >= 215 and opp:points + oppo:points >= 215 and rest = 1 and 2005<=season
play over a total over 212, a team on one days rest off a win of 10 or more; against an opt of b2b games where 215 or more total points were put up.
SDQL: total >= 210 and p:ou margin <= -24 and 75 >= WP >= 60 and o:WP > 50
play over a total of 210 or more, a solid team who went under their previous game by 24 or more; playing a winning team.
oh...thank you bud..damn I can't believe my translation error...wished someone would have told me.Thanks jmon, for getting me off to a good start today and winning me a few bucks!
Hey all, JMon I believe this one is "alive" today as well in the Hawks @ Bucks game. Sorry I have been non-existent, work and holiday season has been crazy lately. All the best fellas.NBA SDQL Best Bet.
12-26-14 12:55p CT
Play LAL OV 213.5 -110
SDQL
total > 200 and rest = 0 and o:rest!=1 and P:margin<=-30
Play over a total over 200, a team on back-to-back revenging a 30+ blowout against an opt not 1 days rest.
Did not even notice it... Saw the play on the under, ran the query and saw 11-48oh...thank you bud..damn I can't believe my translation error...wished someone would have told me.
I think if anyone saw the discrepancy, they would have mentioned it. Probably highly unlikely someone just saw the English part and played the over.
F and p:AL and p:margin<=-8 and WP>=o:WP and line<=-10.5 and 185<=total<=216 and C and division!=o:division and season>=2006That's weird. I just copy pasted from their output but realized they put p:quarter scores which brings up the error. So the query should just be:
HF and p:P4 <= 16 and line <= -8.5 and season >= 2009
But why are you on the under?
Going to let it ride...being my first judgement as a play. Like the line parameter and personalized conference, non divisional parameters as well. Bol friend.
Ooops, guess I am busted -- I never read the translation, just ran the query and liked it...oh...thank you bud..damn I can't believe my translation error...wished someone would have told me.
ps actually on second thought, in a couple of discussion posts you emphasized the point that you were nervous about taking the under in a game with two high-scoring teams like these..
