Originally Posted by
Mako-SBR
I like this premise, because it's gotten better over time and when you ask yourself why that would be, why would it be so much more dominant than say 10 years ago, one of the potential answers is the rise of the internet bettor. Books can't make the line in these games what it really should be, i.e. the favorite laying fewer points (or even getting points at home) because the square bettor likes betting home favorites, and too much money would drop on one side, leading to too much risk exposure.
As an example, in this case Detroit is apparently getting 52% of the money wagered as of this post time, which means the supposed 50/50 money balance books aim for has been achieved.
If they adjusted the line to what it should be, reflecting Orlando as a stronger team against Detroit (and thus getting fewer points), the 52% would climb as square internet bettors tend to like home favorites, and that would tip the money into a riskier proposition for the book as more money comes in on Detroit, like 60/40 or 70/30.
ATS streaks have previously been looked down on over the years, because they lead to Martingale-esque propositions that can destroy bankrolls through either chasing or fading the streak while doubling down into oblivion. But SDQL analysis can lead to insight into +EV where the book is backed into a corner, and this game and SDQL query is a possible example of that.
Good stuff Roland, even if it's a hypothesis that is way off base it's still interesting to see how it plays out.