NBA Stituational Bet, SDQL

Nothing for me tonight...too many competing situations. Gl fellas

I did dig one up possible for the Knicks game tomorrow,,

A and 199>=total>=190 and p:P1+p:P2>=55 and p2:P1+p2:P2>=55 and op: P1+op: P2>=60

Did post dog winners on the Cubs, Twins and hopefully the Mariners in the MLB thread . Yesterday had a total cash and one push(extra innings). Missed two big dogs both by walk offs. Like to see some of you guys get active in there.

This is why you have to stay away from Spurs games like this. Pop was just testing out different things and plays for the whole 2nd half. No worries, take the over in Dallas game.

Originally Posted by JMon

Nothing for me tonight...too many competing situations. Gl fellas

I did dig one up possible for the Knicks game tomorrow,,

A and 199>=total>=190 and p:P1+p:P2>=55 and p2:P1+p2:P2>=55 and op: P1+op: P2>=60

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Curious if this is applicable for Friday as the 30th (last) entry was for Dec. 9, 2012

Thank You.

A and P:L and Pooints > 74 and WP >= 40 and WP <= 49 and o:WP > 29 and o:WP < 54 and rest > 0 and season = 2013

tomorrow cavs.

Originally Posted by JAnthony

This is why you have to stay away from Spurs games like this. Pop was just testing out different things and plays for the whole 2nd half. No worries, take the over in Dallas game.

nice late call

A and P:ats margin <=-10 and P:season=season and P:H and season > 2012

minesota

A and rest=0 and o:WP>=60 and o:rest>=1 and game number>=42

houston SU

Originally Posted by parlayin

Thanks...what's the parameter for win percentage?

Bump

Win percentage query is tA(W) if you wish to query a team whose winning percentage is over 60 percent, then tA(W)>.6

If you wish to query winning percentage of opponent...say one whose WP is less than 40 percent oA(W)<.4

It is all in the query manual on the killersports website.

pp:AFW and p:HFW and HF and op:HFW and division!=o:division and 188<=total<=204 and o:rest>0 and rest>0 and line>=-6


Versus Knicks.

re-ran it and it didn't look so good. Here's what I have in an expanded query. Side (T'wolves) still looks interesting.

AD and rest>0 and o:WP>=60 and o:rest>=1 and game number>=42 and 12> line>6 and total>200 and division!=o:division and P:HDL and season>2012

SU: 4-7 (-5.36, 36.4%)
ATS:8-3-0 (4.09, 72.7%)
avg line: 9.5
O/U: 5-6-0 (-4.00, 45.5%)
avg total: 206.8

Originally Posted by 19th Hole

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Curious if this is applicable for Friday as the 30th (last) entry was for Dec. 9, 2012

Thank You.

Definitely a personal criteria worth noting regarding whether a particular situation is worthy of a play

AD and rest=0 and po:streak>= 4 and p:HFW and division!= o:division and total>200

Originally Posted by green7

AD and rest=0 and po:streak>= 4 and p:HFW and division!= o:division and total>200

Cool one, green! If you eliminate the non-division parameter, you almost double your sample size.

And, if you add o:rest>0, it improves a little more.

GL2A!

Two potential dog MLs

H and 102>=tA(points)>=98 and 102>=oA(points)>=98 and wins+losses>=48 and p:M2>=20

A and -3<=line<=3 and 102>=tA(points)>=98 and 102>=oA(o: points)>=98 and po: points>=100 and ppo: points>=100 and 2008<=season