NBA Stituational Bet, SDQL

Originally Posted by JAnthony

Some from me tonight.

Previous match-up was a home loss, Away, 0<=line<=4, opponent has allowed 100 or more points in its last 2 games, opponent rest>1

A and P:HL and 0<=line<=4 and opo: points>=100 and oppo: points>=100 and o:rest>1

Is that correct? Thanks

199.5>=total>=190 and 98>=tA(points)>=92 and 102>=oA(o: points)>=98 and wins+losses>=42 and po: points>=110 and ppo: points>=110 and rest<3 and o:rest<3

total for bobcats...this would be a good translation test..

Originally Posted by JMon

First one don't ring a bell, but second one yes ! Have you check the ML on dogs of 4 or less

SU: 23-5 (5.25, 82.1%) for dogs. Wow

Originally Posted by azn1234

SU: 23-5 (5.25, 82.1%) for dogs. Wow

actually 12-2, as you have to use line<=4 and D or you will capture all the favs in the situation . A good way to see a situation that has both favs and dogs in it just filter it by using....and line

check out the eastern conference in the total tonight

total > 202 and p: ou margin <= -18 and WP <= 25 and 2009 <= season

simple but powerful total

197.5>=total>191 and tA(points)>=99 and p: points+po: points<=160

Originally Posted by JMon

199.5>=total>=190 and 98>=tA(points)>=92 and 102>=oA(o: points)>=98 and wins+losses>=42 and po: points>=110 and ppo: points>=110 and rest<3 and o:rest<3

total for bobcats...this would be a good translation test..

1) total between 199.5-190
2) Below average offensive team
3) Opponent average defensive team
4) After 42 games or more
5) Allowing 110 points or more then last two games
6) both teams greater then 3 rest days

Pretty good results however I worry about the fact that those 110 points allowed only happened due to overtime so I may skip this query. Always appreciate it tho.

Hey fellas, sometimes I am unsure that you guys actually play the queries you post. I see a lot of queries on the page but do you guys play all of them? Is it possible to say that you are "playing" the query so we all can see how strong you feel about the play?

Originally Posted by FortySix

Hey fellas, sometimes I am unsure that you guys actually play the queries you post. I see a lot of queries on the page but do you guys play all of them? Is it possible to say that you are "playing" the query so we all can see how strong you feel about the play?

I've always gone under the assumption that you play it if it feels right to you. I can't speak for everyone here but it's definitely not the best idea to just go by queries that hit 60%+, it's just an additional tool. Imo, it's best to asses the lines and totals and then checking to see if any good queries match your initial leans since queries have a habit of influencing your decisions, at least to me anyway.

Thanks Cofaga for your reply mate. Much appreciation from Australia. Love this thread. Best of SBR. Just trying to learn the SDQL query myself.

Originally Posted by JAnthony

Some from me tonight.

Previous match-up was a home loss, Away, 0<=line<=4, opponent has allowed 100 or more points in its last 2 games, opponent rest>1

tS(L, N=5)=5 and tS(o: points>=100, N=5)>=4 and o:WP<=30 and 210<=total

p:L and p:ats margin>0 and p:line>=10 and 2<=line<=4 and op:L and op:margin<=-13
(This is a support trend for the SAC pick)

What would the picks be fo these?

Originally Posted by JMon

199.5>=total>=190 and 98>=tA(points)>=92 and 102>=oA(o: points)>=98 and wins+losses>=42 and po: points>=110 and ppo: points>=110 and rest<3 and o:rest<3

total for bobcats...this would be a good translation test..

What r ur picks for tonight?

Originally Posted by evangelizelee

What r ur picks for tonight?

We try not to post "picks" in the thread per se, just the situations we find interesting.

We do that to encourage people to get involved with SDQL and then learn its language for the longer term goal of then contributing their own unique angles after they master the verbiage.

"Teach someone hungry to fish instead of just giving them a fish", yada yada yada, you get the drift.

Originally Posted by Mako-SBR

We try not to post "picks" in the thread per se, just the situations we find interesting.

We do that to encourage people to get involved with SDQL and then learn its language for the longer term goal of then contributing their own unique angles after they master the verbiage.

"Teach someone hungry to fish instead of just giving them a fish", yada yada yada, you get the drift.

Yea I understand. I have been trying to enter the code it doesnt pop up. So I tried to change the 'words'. Still doesnt work. Im trying to look at the examples belows to change it correctly but I cant find all the codes.

just copy and paste into the query box, you can figure it out from there