No problem 46, it's annoying that SBR's autofill routine does it but thankfully our little workaround fixes it.Originally Posted by FortySix
Thanks Mako, just saw your reply now. Will do that. Thanks buddy..
Yeah just worked it out after you told me but I missed the play unfortunately but all good. Hope it hits for you.
Absolutely love this thread, slowly figuring out the SDQL query, I guess it just takes time.
Thanks JMon, I am on the them for 220 as well. Hope it hits!I like it...I will play..
817 Clippers -9 (-110) risk 220.00 win 200.00 (NBA) 03/14/14 19:03:01 #28877505
Great advice, thanks Mako. Looking forward to contributing to the group!Jmon is right this one isn't bad at all, good job Luck.
For game sample sizes everyone is different but generally you want to see as large a sample as possible. I try to shoot for 50+ games from 2006-2013, or roughly 6-7 plays per season. It's ok to go lower for sure, just make sure your filters make logical sense (there's a reason behind them beyond just better numbers).
Nice work and welcome to the thread!
ugg..ot..that's it goes sometimes.
To me, this is something I have difficulties with. Yes, this trend has done well since 2009. However, the three seasons before that it lost and going back ten years you have an ATS record of 41-65, 32-65 between 2003 and 2008.School is in season...
P:L and Po: points >= 110 and op:FL and op:division = opo:division and 2009 <= season
The question I always ask is why would the trend change so dramatically? Personally, I don't see a reason for the change.
If someone knows why there would be such a huge difference in the past few years from the previous ten seasons, I would love to hear it.
Good talk here in this thread.
You learned from it!To me, this is something I have difficulties with. Yes, this trend has done well since 2009. However, the three seasons before that it lost and going back ten years you have an ATS record of 41-65, 32-65 between 2003 and 2008.
The question I always ask is why would the trend change so dramatically? Personally, I don't see a reason for the change.
If someone knows why there would be such a huge difference in the past few years from the previous ten seasons, I would love to hear it.
Good talk here in this thread.
No, I really didn't. I have known this for over 10 years.You learned from it!
Maybe you learned from it?
2-1-1 todaythis support portland too:
A and rest<=2 and line<0 and points+p:line<po
</op</po
love schoolSchool is in season...
P:L and Po: points >= 110 and op:FL and op:division = opo:division and 2009 <= season
tomorrow bulls.p:al and op:margin>10 and p:hw and 65>wp>o:wp and -10<=line<=-5 and h
my logic in this is taking the better team in a away loss revenge spot. Both teams coming off wins and home team is a decent favourite. If you get rid of the 65 still hits over 60% and gives you a larger sample
any input is welcomed thanks
No, I really didn't. I have known this for over 10 years.
Maybe you learned from it?
Yes, I have learned that when I found this situation just three years ago I have made large amount of cash on it. Will it go south, stop trending? It may and out the database it will go, like many before. But one thing that is most important here, I can promise you I will make more money on this situation than I will lose, before and if I dump it. Just like one of my stocks. Perhaps I will just keep my situations to myself.
Last edited by JMon; 03-15-14 at 06:57 AM. Reason: spelling
Push is better than I lossThanks JMon, I am on the them for 220 as well. Hope it hits!
Excellent point. I was originally only voicing an issue I have had using trends over the years. You are correct in that some trends work for awhile and then stop. Some only work a few months as was the case with a 2013 trend earlier used in this thread.Yes, I have learned that when I found this situation just three years ago I have made large amount of cash on it. Will it go south, stop trending? It may and out the database it will go, like many before. But one thing that is most important here, I can promise you I will make more money on this situation than I will lose, before and if I dump it. Just like one of my stocks. Perhaps I will just keep my situations to myself.
Using logic as some people have in their posts explaining their trend I believe helps weed out trends that have a greater chance of going bad. You obviously are doing a great job of knowing when to stop using a trend and when to keep following it. I haven't done as good of job at that as you have.
great conversation! And I am learning!
this is good stuff, and I know nothing works all the time, but you gotta look at the board, Bookmaker only put out one moneyline on the game, at 11:00 in the morning scared me off this play, the board gives you information in real time, and that is important
What other games did you play if you don't kind me asking?? Phoenix Portland??
