so do you still think bledsoe being back was a negative?Originally Posted by No coincidences
CLE +8 (5.25U to win 5)
ive always felt if the player back was into the starting lineup right away, that was the angle to fade them...
im not watching the game - curious if anyone sees anything with him...
Players in/out = fade.so do you still think bledsoe being back was a negative?
ive always felt if the player back was into the starting lineup right away, that was the angle to fade them...
im not watching the game - curious if anyone sees anything with him...
public pounding Suns, and the line didn't moove from 8, so my bells strat ringing lolso do you still think bledsoe being back was a negative?
ive always felt if the player back was into the starting lineup right away, that was the angle to fade them...
im not watching the game - curious if anyone sees anything with him...
Probably on the Bulls tomorrow.
Yes, I do. Different rhythm and cadence to a team, regardless of how good the player is coming back. Takes a while to get the old chemistry back.so do you still think bledsoe being back was a negative?
i like them to win SUProbably on the Bulls tomorrow.
Same thing I was thinking...like em to win straightProbably on the Bulls tomorrow.
CHI +4 (3.45U to win 3)
Wanted to take the Bucks, but at +9.5 -- not +8.5.
You got +4 on Bodog ?CHI +4 (3.45U to win 3)
Wanted to take the Bucks, but at +9.5 -- not +8.5.
he bought a hook obviosulyYou got +4 on Bodog ?
why you say that ??he bought a hook obviosuly
Sports interaction and bodog had +4
look at the juice...why you say that ??
Sports interaction and bodog had +4
Are you dumb?why you say that ??
Sports interaction and bodog had +4
3.45U to win 3
You guys are right, didn't look at that detail, that's why i asked...Are you dumb?
3.45U to win 3
DONT need to insult !
Not insulting, it's just the first thing catches the eye...You guys are right, didn't look at that detail, that's why i asked...
DONT need to insult !
