Login Search

Wallco NHL GOLD (+453 units in 6 years)

Last Post
#1036

Default

Wallco NBA Chase 110
2011-12 System to date: 53-2 (fin. series)
System profit/loss: +15.71 units (fin. series)
Current open series: 1 (-5.30 units)

(3/23/12):
#55 New Jersey (+7) (B) - Loss
#56 Toronto (+5½) (A) - Win

v1 Plays
(A) 33-23
(B) 9-14

(C) 8-5
(D) 3-2

V2 Plays
In production


Games for (3/23/12):
#55 Charlotte @ New Jersey (M/L) (C) (7:35 pm EST)
#57 Memphis @ L.A. Clippers (M/L) (A) (3:05 pm EST)


We will ALWAYS play the M/L on favorites and the point spread (-110) on dogs. There is no point buying in this system, with one exception, if your team is the favorite, and buying down to a zero point spread is cheaper than playing the M/L, then by all means, buy the points, otherwise, M/L on all favorites and point spread on dogs. All results will be based on this principle. All lines and standings are based on FINAL lines from ScoresandOdds.com/. If one of the teams we are playing switches from a favorite to a dog, after my initial post, make sure you get the appropriate line if it differs from what I have posted. The wins and losses will be based on who is the dog team, and who is the favorite on ScoresandOdds.com/ final lines. I will try to update my post as often as I can throughout the day, if the lines change, but it is the individual bettor’s responsibility to get the appropriate line if it differs from my post. On occasion, we will have plays that go head-head. The system will grade ALL bets, regardless of opponents, how you wish to play these games is your choice.
#1037

Default

Wallco NHL GOLD
2011-12 System to date: 190-7 (fin. series)
System profit/loss: +79.31 units (fin. series)
Current open series: 0

(3/23/12):
#196 Columbus (+1½) (B) - Win

v1 Plays
(A) 78-65
(B) 48-17

(C) 12-5
Losses: OTT (-10.96 u), EDM (-14.96 u), DET (-22.03 u), MIN (-15.02 u), PHO (-9.61 u)

v2 Plays
(A) 36-18
(B) 7-11

(C) 9-2
Losses: MON (-18.60 u), DET (-19.51 u)


Games for (3/24/12):
#198 Boston (+1½) @ L.A. Kings (A) (9:05 pm EDT)
#199 Pittsburgh @ Ottawa (+1½) v2 (A) (7:05 pm EDT)
#200 Minnesota (+1½) @ Buffalo (A) (7:05 pm EDT)


Do not place any wagers on teams unless you are sure your team is the dog or favorite. You may be overpaying for a loss if you play the P/L and should have been on the M/L, or lose a game that you would have won had you been on the (+1½) instead of the M/L. We will always play the M/L on favorites and (-110) games, and always play the (+1½) if the team we are betting on is a dog. ALL results will be based on this principle. If it is a close line game, you may want to wait til closer to game time to place your wager so you know whether or not we are on the (+1½) or the (M/L). All lines and standings are based on FINAL lines from ScoresandOdds.com/. If one of the teams we are playing switches from a favorite to a dog, or vice versa, after my initial post, make sure you get the appropriate line if it differs from what I have posted. The wins and losses will be based on who is the dog team on ScoresandOdds.com/ final lines.
System rules & backtest can be found in posts #1 and #2.
Give Points

Points Awarded:

Swan4brownlow gave Wallco99 2 SBR Point(s) for this post.

Mrscofield25 gave Wallco99 2 SBR Point(s) for this post.

Kev the Brit gave Wallco99 2 SBR Point(s) for this post.

#1045

Default

Quote Originally Posted by stevex View Post
Great odds your getting for this "NHL System"

Ha.
Seems to me that the worse the odds, the better the system has to be at picking winners for it to stay in the green.

So, a system that lays as much chalk as this one has to be very accurate to do as well as this one has this year.
#1047

Default

Quote Originally Posted by J.M. Disciple View Post
Waiting for someone to develop a NO OverTime system. I thought about labbying it, but still becomes a bit of a chase. I just do not know the trends for NO OT yet. I know it is around 82% win rate though, just juice is like -300 to -400 at times.

Maybe its something about goals against differential between the two teams.
With that juice, you'd need better than 80% winners. Sounds like the books have it right.
#1048

Default

Quote Originally Posted by Wallco99 View Post
Don't know why I am wasting so much time posting this stuff.
I am not sure either, any chimp can tell you to take teams at -300 every game and keep your fingers crossed you do not lose three in a row. Who in their right mind would be telling people to risk 50 units to win two on a c bet? No system here.