Bog loss $ wise again. Yesterday when was the last time this shell game had a winning day?
He has two d bets in the NBA, 45 units to win one. So 90 units to win 2? What a complete joke.
The rules just keep air betting till a game wins with pretend units.
C bet coming in here too get your monopoly money out!
kenny get your bitch ass out of here its just annoying to scroll through your posts that no one gives a shit about. Im pretty quiet in this thread but the fact that u posted 4 separate times to bitch about the same thing is just annoying in itself. now just get out of here ur clearly unwanted.
Last edited by MLefty; 02-20-13 at 01:19 PM.
yeah it could end up being bad, or he could end up winning all 3... We have a P/L coming for our C bet so odds are we cash. No idea about the D bets in NBA but obviously his NHL system has been profitable so far. Dont make the mistake I did and bet outside your roll. .5-1% is plenty big.
Ok so let's say my odds for these bets are 1.6.Originally Posted by Wallco99
There is no bet B if A wins, there is no bet C if A or B wins. One win series is over. If a game loses, next bet is sum of all losses in that series plus one unit.
If (A) loses at 1.6 from betting 1 unit, my bet (B) will be 1 unit plus 1 unit loss from Bet A? Or would it be 1 unit plus 1 unit loss from A plus the .60 units from A if I had won?
Let's say it gets to bet (C). Will my bet for bet C be 1 unit + 1 unit loss from A + 1 unit loss from B?
If the odds on the "A" bet are -160, you are going to RISK 1.6 units to win 1. If the "A" bet loses, you are going to bet to WIN 2.6 units, 1.6 lost on the "A" bet plus 1 to win on the series. How much you RISK on the "B" bet depends on the odds on the "B" bet. If the "B" bet loses, you're going to bet to WIN money lost on "A" bet + money lost on "B" bet plus 1 unit.Ok so let's say my odds for these bets are 1.6.
If (A) loses at 1.6 from betting 1 unit, my bet (B) will be 1 unit plus 1 unit loss from Bet A? Or would it be 1 unit plus 1 unit loss from A plus the .60 units from A if I had won?
Let's say it gets to bet (C). Will my bet for bet C be 1 unit + 1 unit loss from A + 1 unit loss from B?
Hope that's not too confusing.
It's perfectly clear now, thanks!If the odds on the "A" bet are -160, you are going to RISK 1.6 units to win 1. If the "A" bet loses, you are going to bet to WIN 2.6 units, 1.6 lost on the "A" bet plus 1 to win on the series. How much you RISK on the "B" bet depends on the odds on the "B" bet. If the "B" bet loses, you're going to bet to WIN money lost on "A" bet + money lost on "B" bet plus 1 unit.
Hope that's not too confusing.
Well, if the past games are any indication, Pitt going up 2 goals means Philly's going to win this game outright, so that's good
So I'm reliving the 2011-12 Wallco NHL experience and taking down numbers and stats to get the feel of the system (which is what I do) and man - you guys had a rough beginning didn't you. holy crap.
Last edited by Grinder12000; 02-20-13 at 08:51 PM.
So, I post that, then almost immediately Philly scored 2 to tie it up, now they are up 2. This could be the best system ever: Wait for a team to score, then put your BR into play on that team to loseWell, if the past games are any indication, Pitt going up 2 goals means Philly's going to win this game outright, so that's good
Did you notice any pattern Grinder? Does the 2nd half of the season tend to pick up steam?So I'm reliving the 2011-12 Wallco NHL experience and taking down numbers and stats to get the feel of the system (which is what I do) and man - you guys had a rough beginning didn't you. holy crap.
Wallco NHL GOLD
2012-13 System to date: 30-0 (fin. series)
System profit/loss: +30.00 unitsL(fin. series)
Current open series: 1 (-8.23 units)
(2/20/13):
#31 Philadelphia (+1½) v1 (A) - Win
v1 Plays
(A) 11-12
(B) 8-4
(C) 3-0
v2 Plays
(A) 3-5
(B) 2-3
(C) 3-0
Games for (2/21/13):
#29 N.Y. Islanders (+1½) @ Montreal v1 (C) (7:35 pm EST)
Do not place any wagers on teams unless you are sure your team is the dog or favorite. You may be overpaying for a loss if you play the P/L and should have been on the M/L, or lose a game that you would have won had you been on the (+1½) instead of the M/L. We will always play the M/L on favorites and (-110) games, and always play the (+1½) if the team we are betting on is a dog. ALL results will be based on this principle. If it is a close line game, you may want to wait til closer to game time to place your wager so you know whether or not we are on the (+1½) or the (M/L). All lines and standings are based on FINAL lines from ScoresandOdds.com/. If one of the teams we are playing switches from a favorite to a dog, or vice versa, after my initial post, make sure you get the appropriate line if it differs from what I have posted. The wins and losses will be based on who is the dog team on ScoresandOdds.com/ final lines.
System rules & backtest can be found in posts #1 and #2.
Points Awarded:
OFS gave Wallco99 1 SBR Point(s) for this post.
GeorgeLynch gave Wallco99 1 SBR Point(s) for this post.
I have not gotten that far yet - still early season. It's like watching last years Daytona 500 - I know who wins, I just don't no how they got there! I do know I would be pretty depressed at the 51 game mark and hedging my bets a little getting ready to jump off this ship!Did you notice any pattern Grinder? Does the 2nd half of the season tend to pick up steam?
But we all know it ends well.
And I REALLY have to compliment Wallco for his numbering - genius. seriously.
