Matt Hamill back at 152
Mike "The Ethiopian" Swick...
brock is still doing the wwe thing??
Triple H vs Brock Lesnar - SummerSlam
2012graded with final decision as broadcast ends, see sportsbook
rules section for all conditionsSun 8/19 103 Triple H (end of broadcast ruling) +100 9:00PM 104 Brock Lesnar (end of broadcast ruling) -140
damn how did you post a gif? everytime I try to post one sbr's bot deletes the orginal link and try to upload it to their sbr picture server and completly screws up the gifOriginally Posted by Vaughany
ha THought he'd stopped for a while after going ape-shit back stage at Wrestlemania or sumin!
Just 'copy image url' then click the 'insert image' tab and past it in theredamn how did you post a gif? everytime I try to post one sbr's bot deletes the orginal link and try to upload it to their sbr picture server and completly screws up the gif
Matt Hamill back at 152
Meh... I think Hamill could be somewhat of a gatekeeper, but doubt he can hang with top comp anymore. Who's he fighting at 152?
Wow. Can you say free bread at even? Unreal. the fact that books still put up lines for WWE big 4 PPVs absolutely blows my mind, especially when they're as misguided as that.brock is still doing the wwe thing??
Triple H vs Brock Lesnar - SummerSlam
2012graded with final decision as broadcast ends, see sportsbook
rules section for all conditionsSun 8/19 103 Triple H (end of broadcast ruling) +100 9:00PM 104 Brock Lesnar (end of broadcast ruling) -140
Brock has so much backstage heat accumulated for not delivering on an unprecedented contract that includes being the first person ever allowed to wear other sponsors on his clothing in the ring, a few million $ etc, that for him to make himself unavailable for earlier events is ludicrous. He has no respect for the industry, something Trips does, Trips is also making booking decisions, and has ALWAYS had a penchant for putting himself over guys that DESERVED it, let alone a freeloader. Also, Brock hasn't won ANYTHING since he's come back, and yet is going to main-event Summerslam; the fact that he's over as a heel at all is mostly based on the fact that he DESTROYS things and people (the rest being smarks that felt betrayed when he left the WWE for the NFL and UFC, and those that know he'll be out the door the day after Wrestlemania at Met Life), and that doesn't require winning matches to be perpetuated.
He'll beat the living hell out of Trips until Trips pulls out some unlikely victory. Only thing barring this being free money is the 'end of broadcast' stipulation, and the fact that the only way to build Lesnar's next feud (because he sure as hell won't do it the good old fashioned way) is for some sort of interference to occur, which may result in a loss for Lesnar.
But honest to god, 95% positive Triple H cannot stomach or fathom the idea of jobbing to someone who spits on the legacy he'll be handed when Vince dies. Plus, it's all but confirmed Lesnar is coming back to the UFC at the conclusion of his current deal with WWE. Why put someone over when they're gonna be making money for someone else as soon as the money you're paying the guy stops coming?
there is 0 water left in his legs... scary.Mike "The Ethiopian" Swick...
played Triple H see the post two up + Triple H bangs Stephanie still and Brock bangs that old ladybrock is still doing the wwe thing??
Triple H vs Brock Lesnar - SummerSlam
2012graded with final decision as broadcast ends, see sportsbook
rules section for all conditionsSun 8/19 103 Triple H (end of broadcast ruling) +100 9:00PM 104 Brock Lesnar (end of broadcast ruling) -140
You do know that the WWE, i.e. Pro wrastling is fix right? As in, it's fake, not real, bogus. The outcome is predetermined before the fight (or whatever the hell you call this crap) even begins. One would have to be beyond retarded to pay $50.00 plus to see this event, and even dumber to bet on the on it. Just saying.Wow. Can you say free bread at even? Unreal. the fact that books still put up lines for WWE big 4 PPVs absolutely blows my mind, especially when they're as misguided as that.
Brock has so much backstage heat accumulated for not delivering on an unprecedented contract that includes being the first person ever allowed to wear other sponsors on his clothing in the ring, a few million $ etc, that for him to make himself unavailable for earlier events is ludicrous. He has no respect for the industry, something Trips does, Trips is also making booking decisions, and has ALWAYS had a penchant for putting himself over guys that DESERVED it, let alone a freeloader. Also, Brock hasn't won ANYTHING since he's come back, and yet is going to main-event Summerslam; the fact that he's over as a heel at all is mostly based on the fact that he DESTROYS things and people (the rest being smarks that felt betrayed when he left the WWE for the NFL and UFC, and those that know he'll be out the door the day after Wrestlemania at Met Life), and that doesn't require winning matches to be perpetuated.
He'll beat the living hell out of Trips until Trips pulls out some unlikely victory. Only thing barring this being free money is the 'end of broadcast' stipulation, and the fact that the only way to build Lesnar's next feud (because he sure as hell won't do it the good old fashioned way) is for some sort of interference to occur, which may result in a loss for Lesnar.
But honest to god, 95% positive Triple H cannot stomach or fathom the idea of jobbing to someone who spits on the legacy he'll be handed when Vince dies. Plus, it's all but confirmed Lesnar is coming back to the UFC at the conclusion of his current deal with WWE. Why put someone over when they're gonna be making money for someone else as soon as the money you're paying the guy stops coming?
Yup...You do know that the WWE, i.e. Pro wrastling is fix right? As in, it's fake, not real, bogus. The outcome is predetermined before the fight (or whatever the hell you call this crap) even begins. One would have to be beyond retarded to pay $50.00 plus to see this event, and even dumber to bet on the on it. Just saying.
why the hell are we talking about WWF? This ain't 1996.
Actually there is something interesting about WWE betting.
If you're able to see the setup of future feuds and why this guy has to lose because it makes no sense that the other guy loses...its free money baby!
The text above from spargament makes very much sense although Im not familiar with WWE.
Last edited by Sato; 08-04-12 at 08:48 AM.
agree that spargament makes a great argument, but the same could have been said about the rock vs john cena and the rock ended up winning that match. but i dont know shit about this shit.Actually there is something interesting about WWE betting.
If you're able to see the setup of future feuds and why this guy has to lose because it makes no sense that the other guy wins...its free money baby!
The text above from spargament makes very much sense although Im not familiar with WWE.
Arent the bet limits like $50 or something?c
