KillaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaOriginally Posted by bubblebuttluv
I see you've used that twice tonight. Listen to quality artists, like Nas. Cam'Ron sucks dick.
im 15 pages through this comedy script of a thread and clearly no reason to continue for another 30. Wasted enough time. Your excuses are hilarious tho, like post #197. That is a winner.
Your record in this thread through 15 pages... I didn't count arbs or any livebets, just looking at handicapping record
W-L record 38-37
Underdogs W/L 15- 23
Favs W/L 24-10
(3 picks didn't get marked, we can just say there were underdog winners so 18-23)
Better stick to arbs or livebetting, whatever the hell it is you do so save your night(those post were funny to and still are).
It's very telling that you take something that is so simple, like tracking plays and turn it into a puzzle. But, being on this site for 4 years now, nothing new. No secret why you don't use units or any kind of consistency with your bets. Not even all of your plays were listed with a "small, medium, large" which is a moronic way to list your bets in the first place. Of course, unless you are looking for ambiguity then mission accomplished.
At least now I know who to contact when I need advice on "heads or tails."
Last edited by brooks85; 08-29-13 at 09:18 AM.
So...you think that record is -units? Really? Just assign 1, 2 and 3 units if you want, for small, medium and large. Then calculate units won/lost.im 15 pages through this comedy script of a thread and clearly no reason to continue for another 30. Wasted enough time. Your excuses are hilarious tho, like post #197. That is a winner.
Your record in this thread through 15 pages... I didn't count arbs or any livebets, just looking at handicapping record
W-L record 38-37
Underdogs W/L 15- 23
Favs W/L 24-10
(3 picks didn't get marked, we can just say there were underdog winners so 18-23)
Better stick to arbs or livebetting, whatever the hell it is you do so save your night(those post were funny to and still are).
It's very telling that you take something that is so simple, like tracking plays and turn it into a puzzle. But, being on this site for 4 years now, nothing new. No secret why you don't use units or any kind of consistency with your bets. Not even all of your plays were listed with a "small, medium, large" which is a moronic way to list your bets in the first place. Of course, unless you are looking for ambiguity then mission accomplished.
At least now I know who to contact when I need advice on "heads or tails."
im 15 pages through this comedy script of a thread and clearly no reason to continue for another 30. Wasted enough time. Your excuses are hilarious tho, like post #197. That is a winner.
Your record in this thread through 15 pages... I didn't count arbs or any livebets, just looking at handicapping record
W-L record 38-37
Underdogs W/L 15- 23
Favs W/L 24-10
(3 picks didn't get marked, we can just say there were underdog winners so 18-23)
Better stick to arbs or livebetting, whatever the hell it is you do so save your night(those post were funny to and still are).
It's very telling that you take something that is so simple, like tracking plays and turn it into a puzzle. But, being on this site for 4 years now, nothing new. No secret why you don't use units or any kind of consistency with your bets. Not even all of your plays were listed with a "small, medium, large" which is a moronic way to list your bets in the first place. Of course, unless you are looking for ambiguity then mission accomplished.
At least now I know who to contact when I need advice on "heads or tails."
I'm not sure if my favourite part is that you still think that W/L is any indicator of success (I could be 10-30 and still be up a lot), or that you dislike me so much that you're willing to go through my thread for fifteen pages just to badmouth me. Reminds me of On2TheNext1, I'm touched.im 15 pages through this comedy script of a thread and clearly no reason to continue for another 30. Wasted enough time. Your excuses are hilarious tho, like post #197. That is a winner.
Your record in this thread through 15 pages... I didn't count arbs or any livebets, just looking at handicapping record
W-L record 38-37
Underdogs W/L 15- 23
Favs W/L 24-10
(3 picks didn't get marked, we can just say there were underdog winners so 18-23)
Better stick to arbs or livebetting, whatever the hell it is you do so save your night(those post were funny to and still are).
It's very telling that you take something that is so simple, like tracking plays and turn it into a puzzle. But, being on this site for 4 years now, nothing new. No secret why you don't use units or any kind of consistency with your bets. Not even all of your plays were listed with a "small, medium, large" which is a moronic way to list your bets in the first place. Of course, unless you are looking for ambiguity then mission accomplished.
At least now I know who to contact when I need advice on "heads or tails."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Odds
Last edited by MD; 08-29-13 at 11:42 AM.
TheCalculator, you PM'd me and I tried to reply but your inbox is full. Just letting you know.
Couture pulled off the most blatant shorts-grabbing I've seen this side of Silva/Sonnen in the Vera fight. He was yanking on Vera's shorts in the clinch after his combo at the start of round three for a good thirty seconds, obviously on purpose. I suppose you can't expect a massive PED user who calls himself "The Natural" to play fair, though.
Anthony Pettis wins KO of the Night* +750
Hedge of the week.
Points Awarded:
brokenbrain gave MD 2 SBR Point(s) for this post.
LOLCouture pulled off the most blatant shorts-grabbing I've seen this side of Silva/Sonnen in the Vera fight. He was yanking on Vera's shorts in the clinch after his combo at the start of round three for a good thirty seconds, obviously on purpose. I suppose you can't expect a massive PED user who calls himself "The Natural" to play fair, though.
Excellent hedge. Unfortunately my book doesn't offer those props. Bastards.Anthony Pettis wins KO of the Night* +750
Hedge of the week.
@robnashville: Atila Vegh:"I’m not injured, I’m perfectly fine. It’s about business on Bellator’s side" great work by @tjmarciniak getting it on the record
in it to win it
How heavy are you on Barnett MD?
Tell me a story MD, of the great Bendo by decision opener. I want to laugh and cry.
Its at like +145 or something now.
Heavier than I want to be, that's for sure. Won't be crushed if he loses, but it would hurt.How heavy are you on Barnett MD?
Still a better love story than Twilight.Tell me a story MD, of the great Bendo by decision opener. I want to laugh and cry.
Its at like +145 or something now.
