2,4% chance of LAA losing tonight is soooooo good. If you could only tell me this info four days ago..... I would have skipped the previous three games. Anyway, lets enjoy the game. GL to all
2,4% chance of LAA losing tonight is soooooo good. If you could only tell me this info four days ago..... I would have skipped the previous three games. Anyway, lets enjoy the game. GL to all
Meaning +120ish?- S3 Pit, if line <+100
Meaning -110ish?- S3 Det if line +100 or more
need angels tonight... not a loss this early
I honestly don't know why the odds were so terrible today...they've lost 4 in a row, got outscored 28-11 in getting swept by oakland, and Pujols, Trout, and Hamilton are batting a combined .247 with 2 home runs(both by pujols). Maybe this means they're due, I don't know. I can only hope Hanson pitches as well against Houston as he has historically(4-0, 1.29).
Let's go angels!!
- S3 Pit added. Yes its Det fade as a potential fade play
12.04.2013
S3
(D Bet) LAA: LAA 1,654 1,53u | LAA 1,80 3,163u | LAA 1,787 7,234u | LAA 1,526 24,576u
(B Bet) Tex fade: Seattle 1,649 1,54u | Seattle 2,28 1,984u
(A Bet) NYY: NY Yankees 1,649 1,54u
(A Bet) Pit: Pittsburgh 1,885 1,13u
potential plays:
- S3 Det fade, if line +100 or more
- S3 Oak, if line <+100
________________________________________ _____________________________________
all rules and qualifying teams for every system can be found on post #1-3
potential plays:
- S3 Det fade, if line +100 or more
- S3 Oak, if line <+100
I have det -111 at my book which makes it a play? or do you mean +101, +102, +103, etc...?
I am a little confused on +100 or more in terms of which line direction you mean.
Right now my book has -111 and -109. So oakland has to be +101 and det has to be -101 or more?
Last edited by J.M. Disciple; 04-12-13 at 05:05 PM.
Yea - me too - I can get Detroit at -105 I'm confused with the terminology alsoI have det -111 at my book which makes it a play? or do you mean +101, +102, +103, etc...?
I am a little confused on +100 or more in terms of which line direction you mean.
Which way is "higher". To me higher means -101 is higher then +100 so they are a playWhenever a team starts a road-trip and the odds are +100 or higher in the first game start the chase and fade that team.
For S3 plays:
I believe we are backing favored teams for first game, negative number (-109).
We are fading dogs for first game, positive number (+110).
+100 acts like 0 so greater than +100 (> +100) is +101, +102, etc
+100 acts like 0 so less than +100(< +100) is -101, -102, etc
the Oakland/Detroit game is backwards to the S3 system play. Detroit is favored on the road for the first game of the series.
So we take the wording literally. More then +100 would be +105. Sounds good. No more negative double thinking.
So is the Det/Oak game a play?
- S3 Oak added.
12.04.2013
S3
(D Bet) LAA: LAA 1,654 1,53u | LAA 1,80 3,163u | LAA 1,787 7,234u | LAA 1,526 24,576u
(B Bet) Tex fade: Seattle 1,649 1,54u | Seattle 2,28 1,984u
(A Bet) NYY: NY Yankees 1,649 1,54u
(A Bet) Pit: Pittsburgh 1,885 1,13u
(A Bet) Oak: Oakland 1,971 1,03u
potential plays:
- S3 Det fade, if line +100 or more
________________________________________ _____________________________________
all rules and qualifying teams for every system can be found on post #1-3