sorry for the late post
(B) LAD -185
Does anyone know a good site to see all 3 game series coming up?
Covers.com
On3: Have i got it right when the history of this system shows that the beginning of the season is more risky. You mentioned going easy the first two weeks or so. If one was thinking about increasing the unit amount, now would be a good time?
Meatspin.com typically posts a few series ahead of time
UPDATED for 4/21/2014
System(s) record Chase:
Regular system: 27-1-0; Profit: +16.28 units
Filtered System: 6-0-0; Profit: +6 units
5/2 chase: 0-0-0; profit: 0 units
Records: (regular, filtered, 5/2)
Game 1 (A) win = 20-8; 5-1
Game 2 (B) win = 3-5; 0-1; 0-0
Game 3 (C) win = 4-1; 1-0; 0-0
Regular -- all plays must close at -145 or higher to be an official play
(A) SEA -250/-107 -- play RL
(A) ATL -175
(A) DET -195/+110 -- play RL
(A) CLE -152
Filtered -- all plays must meet 'Regular' requirement and close at an O/U of 9 or higher to be an official play
none
5/2
none
LABBY LINES
So I wanted to ask everyone who follows this thread a question: do you like the current setup where I simply list the plays and the stage of the chase (A, B C) or do you want me to start posting a labby line where i tell you how much to bet? In past years I ran a three line labby, one for A, B, C. If I do run the labby line this year, I think I am going to just run it on one line and we would strike a number(s) off with every play. The A bet would be one strike, B bet would be 2 strikes, C bet would be three strikes.
Pros -- you dont have to calculate the betting amounts, lost units are recouped (in theory)
Cons -- lines can get big and present greater risk, not everyone has the same unit size, can be slightly confusing when numbers get shuffled
Let me know, thank you!
I just like ABC, use my own Martingale
Labby line
labby
abc
Does not matter to me.