Login Search

mlb chase 2013

Last Post
#1696

Default

15.09.2013

S1

(A Bet) Stl: St.Louis 1,526 1,90u

S2

(D Bet) Cle fade: CHW 2,21 0,826u | CHW 2,26 1,449u | CHW 2,33 2,462u | White Sox 1,909 6,311u
(A Bet) Phil fade: Washington 1,503 1,99u

P1

(D Bet) D.Price: TB -1,5 2,41 0,709u | TB -1,5 2,02 1,675u | TB -1,5 2,56 2,169u | TB -1,5 1,787 7,056u

P2

(D Bet) D.Price: TB 1,855 1,17u | TB 1,613 3,54u | TB 1,763 7,484u | TB 1,465 28,374u
Give Points

Points Awarded:

GeorgeLynch gave Stifler 2 SBR Point(s) for this post.

#1700

Default

Quote Originally Posted by Stifler View Post
15.09.2013

S1

(A Bet) Stl: St.Louis 1,526 1,90u

S2

(D Bet) Cle fade: CHW 2,21 0,826u | CHW 2,26 1,449u | CHW 2,33 2,462u | White Sox 1,909 6,311u
(A Bet) Phil fade: Washington 1,503 1,99u

P1

(D Bet) D.Price: TB -1,5 2,41 0,709u | TB -1,5 2,02 1,675u | TB -1,5 2,56 2,169u | TB -1,5 1,787 7,056u

P2

(D Bet) D.Price: TB 1,855 1,17u | TB 1,613 3,54u | TB 1,763 7,484u | TB 1,465 28,374u
- S2 Cle fade series lost = -11,048 units
- P1 D.Price series lost = -11,609 units
- P2 D.Price series lost = -40,568 units

records:
S1: W 53 | L 2 (+16,46 units)
S2: W 44 | L 7 (-51,053 units)
S3: W 216 | L 10 (-81,875 units)
P1: W 24 | L 5 (-24,212 units)
P2: W 47 | L 4 (-42,195 units)
P3: W 53 | L 2 (+22,995 units)


pending:

- P3 C.Sabathia fade, D Bet on next start @home
- S1 Pit fade, C Bet on 23.09.2013

________________________________________ _____________________________________

all rules and qualifying teams for every system can be found on post #1-3
#1705

Default

Quote Originally Posted by Stifler View Post
whats ur mission? U sound like your the handicapping hero. If i remember correctly ur system went down aswell, and your coming in here pounding your chest like king kong. Honestly ur a joke...
The only one that went down was an experimental one, which actually wouldn't have failed had I not added a v2 to it midway through the season. Even still, I knew when to call it quits. Other than that, ALL of my other systems have been successful and turned profits overall. Never was I this far down in any system, or all systems combined for that matter. The real fact is, YOU are the joke and this is the second consecutive system to completely crash around you. Stick to soccer. Oh wait, nevermind, that is why you are in this mess "Captain Parlay". That, as well as the fact that this system really sucks.
#1706

Default

Quote Originally Posted by Wallco99 View Post
The only one that went down was an experimental one, which actually wouldn't have failed had I not added a v2 to it midway through the season. Even still, I knew when to call it quits. Other than that, ALL of my other systems have been successful and turned profits overall. Never was I this far down in any system, or all systems combined for that matter. The real fact is, YOU are the joke and this is the second consecutive system to completely crash around you. Stick to soccer. Oh wait, nevermind, that is why you are in this mess "Captain Parlay". That, as well as the fact that this system really sucks.
Let me quote you:
Correct. Obviously no one is going to play that, but I will be, but using the point spread line at -110. Bet will be graded M/L, however. It's OK to skip series on occasion if risk/reward is way off base, as this one is. (c) True System Playa Wallco99
http://www.sportsbookreview.com/forum/nba-basket...l#post16913982
So please write more about "play like it's supposed to be played" and create funny nicknames like "Captain Parlay" for other people. Or maybe you stay in your own threads and try to look smart there. Tired of your constant rageboy comments flooding this topic.

Stifler, too bad that you ignored my suggestions. Hopefully you can take them into consideration in the future.
#1707

Default

Quote Originally Posted by Wallco99 View Post
The only one that went down was an experimental one, which actually wouldn't have failed had I not added a v2 to it midway through the season. Even still, I knew when to call it quits. Other than that, ALL of my other systems have been successful and turned profits overall. Never was I this far down in any system, or all systems combined for that matter. The real fact is, YOU are the joke and this is the second consecutive system to completely crash around you. Stick to soccer. Oh wait, nevermind, that is why you are in this mess "Captain Parlay". That, as well as the fact that this system really sucks.
This dude Wallco99 can dish it out but can't take it. He hates when people come on his thread and say negative things yet he does it to others....smh...pathetic
#1709

Default

Quote Originally Posted by ExeRok View Post
Let me quote you:
Correct. Obviously no one is going to play that, but I will be, but using the point spread line at -110. Bet will be graded M/L, however. It's OK to skip series on occasion if risk/reward is way off base, as this one is. (c) True System Playa Wallco99
http://www.sportsbookreview.com/forum/nba-basket...l#post16913982
So please write more about "play like it's supposed to be played" and create funny nicknames like "Captain Parlay" for other people. Or maybe you stay in your own threads and try to look smart there. Tired of your constant rageboy comments flooding this topic.

Stifler, too bad that you ignored my suggestions. Hopefully you can take them into consideration in the future.
Perhaps I should have incorporated soccer plays in an NBA system. Never thought of that, good idea Eyerock.
#1710

Default

Quote Originally Posted by Stifler View Post
16.09.2013

S3

(A Bet) Tex fade: Tampa 1,73 1,37u
(A Bet) TB: Tampa 1,73 1,37u
(A Bet) Oak: Oakland 1,714 1,40u
records:
S1: W 53 | L 2 (+16,46 units)
S2: W 44 | L 7 (-51,053 units)
S3: W 218 | L 10 (-79,875 units)
P1: W 24 | L 5 (-24,212 units)
P2: W 47 | L 4 (-42,195 units)
P3: W 53 | L 2 (+22,995 units)


pending:

- P3 C.Sabathia fade, D Bet on next start @home
- S1 Pit fade, C Bet on 23.09.2013
- S3 Oak, B Bet on 17.09.2013

________________________________________ _____________________________________

all rules and qualifying teams for every system can be found on post #1-3