Originally Posted by
flabrah5
Im pretty mad. I slammed FAA live +202. Bookmaker didnt have any live lines in the 3rd set and I saw on BOL that Cilic was +168. I was ready to hedge for a guaranteed nice payday.
Never seen a match like this completely take down the live bets in a 3rd set decider.
FAA looked horrible. Easy 2nd serves and he thinks he hitting for a homerun on the court.
Cilic was the play, lesson learned to not bet while having bad service in a car jam so I make sure I get the bet in. Other matches went longer than expected and I wouldve been able just to take the over and Cilic. But the FAA live +202 for 5 units on 10 tickets was an absolute bummer to not hedge and get guaranteed money.
Do sites have algorithms that know Id be able to do that? This is the first time this has happened to me and ive been on a heater from doing this exact same thing. FAA winning 2nd set is exactly what I had planned for a great hedge at +202 odds and Cilic +168ish (what I saw on BetOnline)