[jjgold]

-420 vs Troicki

Good bounce back if he wins

[brodie]

-420 is outrageous (given I didnt see him play against le monf).. troicki + games has to be the play no?

[tsimmns]

Id rather take Nadal at -2 games at -220 odds.

[yisman]

I am betting Troicki

laying 1 to 4 on Nadal is absurd

[sluggy1616]

+4.5

[jjgold]

Nadal does seem over valued here

How can you take him

[SirtySree]

am i the only one that got buried by nadal in every match this tourney

[yisman]

am i the only one that got buried by nadal in every match this tourney

I didn't do every match but I bet Tomic, Monfils, and Troicki.

[jjgold]

Well a win is a win

Good win for him..confidence builder

[Goat Milk]

People that think Nadal is suddenly no longer a top 3 player in the world bc he's lost a few matches are your typical knee jerk reactors that never see the big picture. We're talking about Rafa Nadal here. And he's no where near done....not even close...not even 3 years from now will he be done... Just remember that going forward.

[SirtySree]

Nadal might still be good in general but he hasnt been good on grass since 2011. 5-5 record on grass between 2012-2014 and all against players well below his level.

Btw I didn't fade Nadal with the ML. I took 1st set, 2nd set, etc... He's dropped a set on grass in an insane % of his grass matches overall, not just after 2011. I just happened to pick off the wrong sets.

EDIT:
He has dropped a set or more in 38 matches out of 72 on grass. Take away 2008 and those numbers become even more horrid.

[Robber]

People that think Nadal is suddenly no longer a top 3 player in the world bc he's lost a few matches are your typical knee jerk reactors that never see the big picture. We're talking about Rafa Nadal here. And he's no where near done....not even close...not even 3 years from now will he be done... Just remember that going forward.

I remember that you're the biggest square on the forum

Rafa on grass=mediocre tennis

[Seto]

I remember that you're the biggest square on the forum

Rafa on grass=mediocre tennis

5 Wimbledon Finals in a row is mediocre?

[SirtySree]

the one time i decided nt to fade him... zzz good price on 1st set nd +1.5 sets

[SirtySree]

rumour has it that if u gift nadal the match, he will take u for a ride on his private jet

[yisman]

totally forgot to fade Nadal today

I believe he was up 4-2 in the third set and lost four straight games

was hoping he'd win so I could fade him next round

[brodie]

dolgop should've taken this one in straights to be honest. rafa got lucky. the blonde girl overpowered him the whole match

[yisman]

no surprise to see Nadal fail on grass, guy likes to screw me over though.

Fade him and he wins a tournament

forget to fade him and he gets dominated by Dolgo

[sluggy1616]

dolgop should've taken this one in straights to be honest. rafa got lucky. the blonde girl overpowered him the whole match

That blonde girl won me good cash live in the 3rd set

[jjgold]

Well this was a higher level tournament Amd nadal gets knocked out in the first round

I can't see him lasting more than two rounds at Wimbledon

[bruceBRUCEbruce]

5 Wimbledon Finals in a row is mediocre?

seriously, great play would be at least 10 wimbledon finals in a row

[some of youse are seriously too dumb to be gambling on sport and prove it here day after day]

[Robber]

It's true. There are some real morons here.

Nadal did not get to 5 wimbledon finals in a row. He didn't play in the 2009 tournament. His last Wimbledon final was four years ago.

Anyone who knows anything about tennis knows that this is 2015, not 2011, and things have changed.

Just don't expect goat milk to figure that out.

Five finals in a row? You wish.

[Seto]

It's true. There are some real morons here.

Nadal did not get to 5 wimbledon finals in a row. He didn't play in the 2009 tournament. His last Wimbledon final was four years ago.

Anyone who knows anything about tennis knows that this is 2015, not 2011, and things have changed.

Just don't expect goat milk to figure that out.

Five finals in a row? You wish.

Um no you are the moron. He made the 2006, 2007, 2008, 2010, 2011 finals and as you astutely pointed out, did not participate in 2009, which by any reasonable logic means that year doesn't count.

[Robber]

Ummm you are braindead and a moron

There was a Wimbledon tournament held and he wasn't in the finals, thus breaking the streak

That's a fact

Do you even know what "straight" or "consecutive" mean?

Enjoy watching Nadal fail to reach another Wimbledon final. You, goat milk, and the rest of the braindead squares can pretend it's still 2011.

[Seto]

Ummm you are braindead and a moron

There was a Wimbledon tournament held and he wasn't in the finals, thus breaking the streak

That's a fact

Do you even know what "straight" or "consecutive" mean?

Enjoy watching Nadal fail to reach another Wimbledon final. You, goat milk, and the rest of the braindead squares can pretend it's still 2011.

He reached the final in 5 consecutive Wimbledon championships he appeared in. Happy? The point of my original post was that yeah, a guy who made the final in 5 consecutive Wimbledons he participated in cannot be branded who sucks on grass. But count on a guy at SBR to use semantics to try and convince himself he's proving you wrong

You seem to assume I'm a Nadal fan (very far from being the case) or that I think he's going to win this tournament (I don't) or something. That's funny. I don't recall ever saying anything like that but I guess you have to act like a tough guy and make yourself feel superior so whatever makes you happy and helps you get through the day

[Robber]

It took you four days to come up with your moronic previous post which was an out and out lie

Not semantics, facts

You idiots are bringing up Nadal 4+ years ago when that has little relevance

Look at his Wimbledon performance the last few years

I posted the truth and a few of you are in denial

It's like that clown homie who air bets Nadal every tournament and his defense is that Nadal used to be great

Yeah, Andre Agassi used to be great too

[Robber]

He reached the final in 5 consecutive Wimbledon championships he appeared in. Happy? The point of my original post was that yeah, a guy who made the final in 5 consecutive Wimbledons he participated in cannot be branded who sucks on grass. But count on a guy at SBR to use semantics to try and convince himself he's proving you wrong

You seem to assume I'm a Nadal fan (very far from being the case) or that I think he's going to win this tournament (I don't) or something. That's funny. I don't recall ever saying anything like that but I guess you have to act like a tough guy and make yourself feel superior so whatever makes you happy and helps you get through the day

What's funny is you calling me a moron when you don't even know the meaning of "consecutive".

Nice tough guy act, but you're just making yourself look stupid.

[Seto]

You understood very well what I was saying when I mentioned the 5 finals in a row. I even tried to clarify it for you in the last post explaining I meant "5 finals in a row in tournaments he participated it", which anyone with a brain understood is what I meant in my first post. The fact that you are still arguing this desperately trying to make yourself feel right is fukking pathetic.

I am in denial of what exactly? When did I ever say I thought Nadal would do well at Wimbledon this year? Please show me the post. Thanks.

[Robber]

Try reading this thread, slowly this time

I posted about Nadal now

You came back with a bald faced lie about Nadal in the distant past which has little relevance

[Seto]

I give up. Not worth my time anymore.

Good luck these next 2 weeks.

[BrokeB]

Lmao at nadal still being top 3.

No fukkin way.

I would take Murray, djokovi can, wawrinka, nishikori and maybe even federer over nadal at this point of his career.

His body is wearing down and his weapons were never THAT great even at his peak

[Robber]

As I predicted, another early exit for Nadal at Wimbledon

A lot of sheep at sbr who can't accept reality