1. #1
    ManeOnFire
    ManeOnFire's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 05-13-14
    Posts: 851
    Betpoints: 1959

    Does Wawrinka Deserve The Australian Open Title?

    Do you guys think Wawrinka would have beat Nadal if Nadal wasn't injured?

  2. #2
    fcmb
    fcmb's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 03-02-14
    Posts: 628
    Betpoints: 6189

    Imo NO & NO

  3. #3
    Demonata
    Demonata's Avatar SBR PRO
    Join Date: 07-12-11
    Posts: 25,799
    Betpoints: 5318

    Yes. He won and was playing great to get to the final so he could of beat him even if nadal was not injured. He didn't play all injured players. He won against other great competition.

  4. #4
    redtagboys
    redtagboys's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 01-31-12
    Posts: 189

    Hes been garbage since, almost an auto fade past the first/second round in tournaments.

  5. #5
    matt1216
    matt1216's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 10-27-11
    Posts: 14,683
    Betpoints: 1052

    I'm not sure what u guys are thinking.... He beat Djokovic the best hardcourt player in the world in a 5 setter.... That alone should be the title.

    Wawrinka won set 1 when Nadal was not injured. Of course he deserves it...



    Does Nadal deserve all the French titles because he played who he played when he played them? Djoker was sick this year for the French open final. It is what it is boys.
    Nomination(s):
    This post was nominated 1 time . To view the nominated thread please click here. People who nominated: Demonata

  6. #6
    redtagboys
    redtagboys's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 01-31-12
    Posts: 189

    Djokovic 1-4 last four grand slams. Should be 3-4

  7. #7
    amolg24
    amolg24's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 04-26-13
    Posts: 373
    Betpoints: 3317

    Quote Originally Posted by matt1216 View Post
    I'm not sure what u guys are thinking.... He beat Djokovic the best hardcourt player in the world in a 5 setter.... That alone should be the title.

    Wawrinka won set 1 when Nadal was not injured. Of course he deserves it...



    Does Nadal deserve all the French titles because he played who he played when he played them? Djoker was sick this year for the French open final. It is what it is boys.
    Don't be fooled by Wawrinka's performance on clay and grass (he wasn't to shabby on grass either) This guy is a MONSTER hard court player. He will come out as his best on the hard court.

  8. #8
    Simon Gruber
    scientific thought and reasoning
    Simon Gruber's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 05-02-13
    Posts: 2,342
    Betpoints: 31

    Quote Originally Posted by amolg24 View Post
    Don't be fooled by Wawrinka's performance on clay and grass (he wasn't to shabby on grass either) This guy is a MONSTER hard court player. He will come out as his best on the hard court.
    he won the Monte Carlo masters and made the semis at Queens and quarters at Wimbledon.

  9. #9
    amolg24
    amolg24's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 04-26-13
    Posts: 373
    Betpoints: 3317

    Quote Originally Posted by Simon Gruber View Post
    he won the Monte Carlo masters and made the semis at Queens and quarters at Wimbledon.
    Okay, but Grand Slams are what count and he sucked in the French.... and my (not too shabby on grass comment referred to his Wimbledon performance)

    Anyways, would anyone argue that hard court is his best surface? Its not really debatable if you've watched him play

  10. #10
    EaglesPhan36
    EaglesPhan36's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 12-06-06
    Posts: 71,662

    This is like asking if Federer deserves his French Open title because he didn't beat Rafa. Silly.

  11. #11
    ManeOnFire
    ManeOnFire's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 05-13-14
    Posts: 851
    Betpoints: 1959

    Quote Originally Posted by EaglesPhan36 View Post
    This is like asking if Federer deserves his French Open title because he didn't beat Rafa. Silly.
    Do you think Wawrinka would have beat an uninjured Nadal?

  12. #12
    EaglesPhan36
    EaglesPhan36's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 12-06-06
    Posts: 71,662

    Who knows. Would Djokovic have won Wimbledon against Roger Federer age 29? Hypotheticals can go on all day.

    Wawrinka won. That's all that matters to history.

Top