There was discussion earlier about Challenger Matches and punters/bookies getting the odds wrong.
Well imo Qualifying matches are even better. The primary reason is this - They're much more motivated to make the main draw due to the prize money, compared to the poorly paid prize money in most Challenger tournaments.
So just like Challenger tournaments, there's less liquidity and the odds aren't as sharp. However motivation (lack thereof) most definitely will cost you. You generally don't have that worry with Qualifying matches.
Feel free to join in. Only post when you feel it's value given the odds.
---
So here it goes.
Feel like Pavic is underrated by the books here. He just beat Darcis and took Lu to a 3rd set TB a few days ago.
Nothing too flash. Sure. But Stakhovski, albeit good on grass (he took out Fed last year at Wimbledon) can play some pretty horrible tennis too. And that happens quite frequently. Pavic has some big weapons and has the game to keep it close.
Screen Shot 2014-06-14 at 9.21.45 pm.jpg