Originally Posted by
BAY HORSE
But even then the relationship would be based partly on whether or not u think the match ends in three sets or two. A small say + 1.5 spread makes more sense to me if i assume there is a higher chance the dog takes a set, or on the other hand making a play on the fav ML vs. Taking even a small amount of chalk. On a large spread as tipsa points out you can end up getting the high hard one either way. Of course i hope that isn't often the case, I mean Jesus, wtf? If i had played the +5.5 spread thinking ivanovic takes a set, and then likewise taken the over assuming she takes a set, and then this happens- at that point i'm stumbling around in public with my thermos and my pants around my ankles like steve martin in "the jerk".