Prize money(13' numbers) ranges from 35,000 total purse to 125,000. My question to you guys is....Over the long term..say hundreds and hundreds of matches, would you say more underdogs would win in the low purse tourneys or the high purse ones???Think of the 35,000 and 45,000 as ATP 250's and the others as 500's to 1000.Which you could make a case that the 250's all kinds of weird shit happens from qualies making semis and finals and wildcards winning to the higher ones where the favs dominate.
Theory is that the decent ranked players stay away from the small purses and would rather play the bigger for more points and the stiffs fill the ranks.Then the better ones notorious for loading up on the others like LU and Istomin play the higher purses,whereas more favs win. Maybe do an analysis of overall ranking of players to overall price or some other math comparison.