No. I don't. He is passive. You STRIKE (not even appear) as having trouble being able to comprehend English, more so roll around from thread to thread, either pointing out the obvious or askkng questions with obvious answers to them, had you only "read" the person's actual post!
BTW.
Passive:
influenced, acted upon, or affected by some external
force, cause, or agency; being the
object of action
rather than causing action (opposed to active ).
Copying my Hanescu pick was passive. Thought bubble*(He's typed a good worded post with decent but not excellent grammar, let me assume he knows what he's blabbering on about and tail)*
Get it?
A better word he could be partly described for being also, vacant.
A quote I like to use with regard to "statistics" like him.
The whole problem with the world is that fools and fanatics are always so certain of themselves… and wiser people so full of doubts.
-Bertrand Russell