Ok SBR, this case is four months old, surely there has been some resolution to this. VIP is offering some great promos right now but I refuse to deposit until I get word on these ****** at VIP. I've used them before and I can tell you that they go through your bank for more than the original transaction amount. Albeit, pennies more, but the point is it is more than the agreed amount. That doesn't appear to be the problem in this case but I want to know if the accused took a shot at VIP or VIP saw the $76k and took a shot at the player. Or was this a case of the bank denying the transaction because I see VIP cut off Washington state players and Washington also made these checks a crime.
Another question is if the player had prior problems with ******* why continue to let them play or at the very least cut off the *******.