1. #1
    bigboydan
    bigboydan's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 08-10-05
    Posts: 55,425

    Player vs. GamblersPalace

    Player vs. GamblersPalace (SBR rating C)

    A GamblersPalace user is told that because he has requested a withdrawal he was ineligible for, due to rollover restrictions, he must redo his seven-time rollover (play-through of deposit + bonus) from the beginning. GamblersPalace does not list any rules about restarting the wagering requirement in its bonus terms. SBR does not have any other complaints filed against Gamblers Palace which was upgraded twice in 2007.

  2. #2
    SBR Lou
    SBR Lou's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 08-02-07
    Posts: 37,863

    So let me see if I understand this.

    How ineligible was he? Had he rolled over just once or something? If he came close to completing the rollover, or even half way I think it's unfair he should have to redo the entire rollover. He should just have to wager through the remaining times before cashing out.

  3. #3
    RickySteve
    SBR is a criminal organization
    RickySteve's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 01-31-06
    Posts: 3,415
    Betpoints: 187

    Resetting the rollover is absolutely ridiculous.

  4. #4
    Bullajami
    Bullajami's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 12-23-05
    Posts: 472
    Betpoints: 90

    That seems so goofy I am incredulous. Are we sure there wasn't a language gap here or something? How can they reset a rollover based on a payout request?

  5. #5
    Bill Dozer
    @BillDozer110
    Bill Dozer's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 07-12-05
    Posts: 10,894
    Betpoints: 21705

    Email forwarded to mgt. Will likely update tomorrow.

Top