[eyeball]

I used them last year and everything was fine cashed out with no problems .Are they still Ok?

[bigboydan]

Even though this book is still fairly new (opened in Oct, 2007). BetJoint has no outstanding complaints or processing issues levied against them at this time. In fact the only thing I found worth noting on this front was this.

As far as payout go:

On 2-12-08 SBR posters BAUS (x2), Uga Boga, and Jason reported prompt payment from BetJoint, which I did note in the payout report for February.

FWIW: They definitely do not like winners (recreational book), because they showed SBR poster Katstale the door before they even opened it.

[tomcowley]

Only because this complaint was "resolved" completely illogically allowing BetJoint to steal player funds. Don't go anywhere near them.

http://www.sportsbookreview.com/forum/state-indu...-betjoint.html

[Bill Dozer]

BetJoint loses points for a buried rule saying don't do xyz instead of having the software handle it but they didn't steal his funds.

[tomcowley]

From what I've seen, they did. The player won the first 2 legs of a 3-teamer, hedged the third leg, and the book simply voided both wagers IN FULL, instead of voiding only the offending wager(s). See the linked thread for my analogy to voiding because the 3rd leg was bet on an obviously bad line. Even under BetJoint's hidden rule, they have no grounds to 1) not void the 3rd leg of the freeplay parlay (as well as the straight bet hedge) and 2) not pay it as a winning 2-teamer.