[lonnie55]

How would you grade a multiple/accumulator bet if only one bet contains a mistake, price error, cancelled match etc. but all the other bets on the betslip are fully valid?

IBAS thinks it's okay if a book voids the whole betslip if only one bet contains a pricing mistake

[Motorhead11]

I i understand correct, according to their T&C they can void a multiple betslip if one games was priced wrong. However, there would be no price wrong if any of your rest teams had lost. First time seen such T&C tbh

[shari91]

If that's in their T&C's then fair enough but I wouldn't be playing there again anytime soon.

[lonnie55]

I i understand correct, according to their T&C they can void a multiple betslip if one games was priced wrong. However, there would be no price wrong if any of your rest teams had lost. First time seen such T&C tbh

I could not even find the relevant term in their ToS. The only thing they say about cancelled bets in a multiple bet is:

"21. The following rules apply to a combination bet:

21.1 If one or more events which are part of a customer's combination bet are canceled, interrupted or do not take place out of a certain reason and any other sections mentioned in the Terms & Conditions can not be applied in this situation, this particular event will have a quota of 1,0. The same applies in Tennis, should within the combination bet a match should be terminated due to sickness or injury of one of the participants."

But no word about how they handle price erros in multiple bets.

[HedgeHog]

Self serving unfair T & C's should not be relevant. The fair solution is to let all the legitimate legs of the parlay stand and pay out at the adjusted price if they all win. To quote the Osmonds: "One bad apple don't spoil the whole bunch".

[Motorhead11]

I could not even find the relevant term in their ToS. The only thing they say about cancelled bets in a multiple bet is:

"21. The following rules apply to a combination bet:

21.1 If one or more events which are part of a customer's combination bet are canceled, interrupted or do not take place out of a certain reason and any other sections mentioned in the Terms & Conditions can not be applied in this situation, this particular event will have a quota of 1,0. The same applies in Tennis, should within the combination bet a match should be terminated due to sickness or injury of one of the participants."

But no word about how they handle price erros in multiple bets.

Seems they don't have such rule then, they are obviously scammers, they have no valid argument to void all bets

[Mezidon]

Pls am sorry am posting maybe in the wrong trend but pls , I won a bet at ubc365, but theyou refused to pay me claiming match was a fixed one. And match was never fixed pls what do I do?

[semibluff]

I guess it comes down to the individual books rules. If the book has a rule stating it can void a parlay just because 1 of the selections is incorrectly priced then you bet with that book knowing the risk. It's a crappy rule.

Normally if a parlay has 7 selections and 1 selection is void for pretty much any reason then the parlay stands on the other 6 selections. Any bonuses or special terms relating to the parlay would be void but that wouldn't void the rest of the parlay. There are special circumstances that would cause the bet to be void, such as having XXX points available on a 7 team teaser. If 1-6 games were void the book would rightly void the parlay because the XXX points could radically alter the true odds. Another circumstance would be if there was a minimum selection stipulation such as the UK stipulation of having a minimum of 5 selections on soccer bets in the 1980s. (There was a concern about match-fixing so bets were required to include a minimum of 5 teams in parlays). A void selection that reduced the bet below the minimum selections would make the entire bet void. A book would also be entitled to void a bet where 1 or more selections were void and a cumulative price for the original bet was given rather than the price being based on specific individual odds. EG 7 selection parlay at odds of +4000. Without specific odds for the void selection the book would not be able to adjust the price thus the bet would be void.

Voiding bets where 1 price is incorrect is not the norm and I can understand why @lonnie55 is pissed about it here.

[acquavallo]

IBAS = better for the books than the players = just about better than nothing only.

[cashin81]

theres no way you would get a push, if one of the selections lost.

that would be incredible... hey have your money back one of the odds was wrong, so here.

[cashin81]

i guess most people bet bad lines in singles, so there wont be many people with experience.