1. #1
    Mediterranean
    Mediterranean's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 05-12-18
    Posts: 27
    Betpoints: 293

    Minimum bet rule

    "We close very few accounts and a high proportion of these are for responsible gambling or anti-money laundering grounds or because they are duplicate accounts, rather than for trading reasons." LOL

    https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...ING-money.html

  2. #2
    lonnie55
    lonnie55's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 04-08-16
    Posts: 2,689
    Betpoints: 12267

    Regulated books should be required to allow every bettor at least 100 $/€/£ profit per bet and match unless a limitation for reasons of gambling addiction is justifiable.

  3. #3
    HeeeHAWWWW
    HeeeHAWWWW's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 06-13-08
    Posts: 5,487
    Betpoints: 578

    Min bet is only horse-racing so far, but they're copying each other for PR purposes.

    Guessing it'll spread to soccer because the sheer insane volume there makes it practical - prolly PL first, then CL and the other four big Euro leagues.

  4. #4
    piterp
    piterp's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 06-02-13
    Posts: 241
    Betpoints: 1148

    English bookmakers acted like ponzi scheme or pyramid -you are good if loading money into them if not they dont want you

  5. #5
    Optional
    Optional's Avatar Moderator
    Join Date: 06-10-10
    Posts: 57,784
    Betpoints: 9183

    Quote Originally Posted by HeeeHAWWWW View Post
    Min bet is only horse-racing so far, but they're copying each other for PR purposes.

    Guessing it'll spread to soccer because the sheer insane volume there makes it practical - prolly PL first, then CL and the other four big Euro leagues.
    Min risk limits have been around in Australia for quite a while on horse racing. Hasn't made much difference really. Sharps just get totally banned instead of limited. And it hasn't crossed over to sportsbetting as yet.

  6. #6
    HeeeHAWWWW
    HeeeHAWWWW's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 06-13-08
    Posts: 5,487
    Betpoints: 578

    Quote Originally Posted by Optional View Post
    Min risk limits have been around in Australia for quite a while on horse racing. Hasn't made much difference really. Sharps just get totally banned instead of limited. And it hasn't crossed over to sportsbetting as yet.
    Yeah - the interesting thing about the UK version is that they'll lay that min bet to anyone, even those previously banned.
    Points Awarded:

    Mediterranean gave HeeeHAWWWW 1 SBR Point(s) for this post.


  7. #7
    piterp
    piterp's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 06-02-13
    Posts: 241
    Betpoints: 1148

    At least in Australia government see how bookmakers acted and they are not useless

    https://www.accc.gov.au/media-releas...free-bet-offer


    In UK People can use betfair exchange , smakets ,matchbook, betdaq without bet limitation

  8. #8
    Optional
    Optional's Avatar Moderator
    Join Date: 06-10-10
    Posts: 57,784
    Betpoints: 9183

    Quote Originally Posted by HeeeHAWWWW View Post

    Yeah - the interesting thing about the UK version is that they'll lay that min bet to anyone, even those previously banned.
    Really?? They will let people reopen accounts that have been previously closed?

    Or just allow limited accounts to now bet the 500 on horses?

    If it is the former, each account they re-open is like an admission the closure was purely for winning I think.

  9. #9
    HeeeHAWWWW
    HeeeHAWWWW's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 06-13-08
    Posts: 5,487
    Betpoints: 578

    Quote Originally Posted by Optional View Post
    Really?? They will let people reopen accounts that have been previously closed?
    Yep. Surprised me!

Top