Abe, please read what I wrote. I neither conformed or denied the accusations against Opi. The point of my post was that when someone defames someone via published or written material its called libel not slander.
If you want my opinion as to the book's rule, I'm fine with having a sportsbook limit the days an open parlay can sit. However, I do believe that if they remove the open parlay they need to pay out the completed portion of the parlay. I do not believe they should benefit from having a rule.
I'm sure these books have reserve/liquidity requirements as a part of regulations. So, if everyone had open parlays and/or someone forgot about an open parley, should they be required to sit money aside?
I understand the rule, but to remove the parlay and not payout what was completed thus far is borderline theft.
I believe what Opi was saying is that instead of saying the book is garbage, the rule is stupid, and it was theft. Perhaps the computer system removed the parlay automatically. So, submit a complaint and give the book the opportunity to make it right by either adding back the parlay and/or paying out the completed portion.