[dynamite140]

This is my last comment on the topic because I literally feel like I am on an episode of "are you smarter than a 5th grader?"

I did not and do not think filing a complaint will do a damn thing for me in this case. That was not the intent of starting this thread, and I never planned to file a complaint. I did so at the request of a mod. Period.

I understand this concept must be like solving a rubik's cube for you, and I wish you the best of luck trying to solve it.

This is your last comment because you don't want to answer those 2 questions i posted. Why are you dodging the question?

[dynamite140]

I never once said the limits are or should be the same. I simply said that betting live NHL is not betting on some obscure markets that would get someone limited right away. I understand this concept may be a difficult one to grasp for you, so I apologize in advance for your confusion.

Yea you "obviously" didn't mean pinnacle. I'm sure you have a huge list of books that take decent NHL limits late in the game, and not just between periods. I'm sure these are all books that haven't limited me yet, and books that take decent limits without limiting right away. Again, I'm the know it all.

Read your statement. Ask anyone here does that sound like nhl live betting should have similar limits as nfl live betting. Thats what it exactly sounds like. Obviously nhl live betting is not same as obscure markets.


From your statement obviously you didn't mean pinnacle, you talk like the arrogant know it all that probably thinks i didn't even know the answer to it. Anyone that bets nhl live betting knows pinnacle is one of the books. There aren't a huge list of books that take decent nhl limits. Theres very few with pinnacle being one of them. There's less than 5.

[dynamite140]

Also most of the mods here know you create a lot of threads complaining about stuff most people don't complain of. You get limited, you go to another sportsbook.

[dynamite140]

Rangerz, explain


1. Why? It's not like I'm betting on some random low level league that no one ever heard of. Betting live NHL should be no different than betting live NFL.


Explain this statement. Do you mean nhl live betting limits should be the same as nfl live betting limits? Or do you mean something else? Since this statement sounds exactly what it sounds like.




2. Also when you mention how they say markets very in limits nonsense.



You really don't know what this means?

Let see if Rangerz is willing to answer these 2 questions. Or is he going to dodge them since he doesn't want to answer these questions.

[evo34]

Why? It's not like I'm betting on some random low level league that no one ever heard of. Betting live NHL should be no different than betting live NFL.

Are you really asking why live betting limits are lower than full-game limits? I think you know the answer. You just want the world to conform to your desire to bet size on in-game hockey, even though the world is telling you in no uncertain terms: "it ain't happening."

[Optional]

Woah... this went a bit out of control.


Thanks for sending in the complaint form Rangerz. Did not mean to start this bun fight over it but hopefully it helps SBR get some info to help us all understand their policies a bit better.

[futbolmundial]

Woah... this went a bit out of control.


Thanks for sending in the complaint form Rangerz. Did not mean to start this bun fight over it but hopefully it helps SBR get some info to help us all understand their policies a bit better.

Shouldn't sbr know about their policies by now? Being that sbr recently graded them c-

That being said I do understand that live betting can be tricky for a shop. Perhaps sportsbet.io limits winners just like many shops around... no news there if so...

[rangerz2478]

Are you really asking why live betting limits are lower than full-game limits? I think you know the answer. You just want the world to conform to your desire to bet size on in-game hockey, even though the world is telling you in no uncertain terms: "it ain't happening."

Not one place in this thread did I say they should be the same, not even close. I gave the limits when my account opened, gave the bet size they current reject on the exact same market. Its simple as that. The comparison was simply to say it is not betting on some random low level market. You guys are running with a comment and using your own interpretations but thats fine, as you wish.

[rangerz2478]

Woah... this went a bit out of control.


Thanks for sending in the complaint form Rangerz. Did not mean to start this bun fight over it but hopefully it helps SBR get some info to help us all understand their policies a bit better.

Its okay, getting attacked for simply doing what was recommended by sbr will naturally lead to attacks on here from dynamite. I can live with it.

[rangerz2478]

UPDATE: Finally got an email this morning from the manager that the reduced limits apply to everyone in hockey.

Interesting response, considering I tried multiple live NFL wagers yesterday. (a sport that everyone agrees should have higher limits) About 10 of them, all for under 1 btc, and the only one that was accepted was a wager to win 0.125 btc. 9 out of my 10 nfl wagers were rejected for being over the limit. So the limitation is NOT in just hockey, it is in all markets for my account.

Had they said they have lowered the live betting limits for all, that would be one thing but that is not what they said. I'd be very interested to hear if someone else with a sportsbet account is able to get their bets accepted, because it sure as hell sounds like they are not being honest about my account, but I will see what they tell sbr.

[rangerz2478]

UPDATE:

Was able to get a couple decent sized bets (1-2 btc's) tonight without many rejections. (until I got past an apparent market limit) I'm hoping this will continue at least for a little while instead of the 0.1 btc wagers that were constantly rejected when this thread was started.

Not sure if sbr spoke with them or what. But I wanted to be fair and give an update on both sides, good or bad.