Originally Posted by
trixtrix
as i stated in the previous thread, this is what makes this situation so grievious
1.) wagerweb have correlated parlay stipulation in rules, however many other books have the same rules in affect, and then they config their software to disallow those parlays.
2.) wagerweb software DISALLOWS/RESTRICTS high correlated parlays, (ie 1st half fav -20/ over 28), their software restricts any parlays where the spread/total ratio exceeds 50%.
3.) so by the fact that they restricted highly correlated parlays, and their software ACCEPTED my plays which i consider to be loosely correlated (1st H: C Mich -9.5 parlayed w/ 1st H: total over 23. another example: 1st H: Kansas -11.5 parlayed w/ 1st H: total over 28.5.)
what can any reasonable/logical man conclude from this except these accepted parlays would be considered FAIR consider they have the ability and did block out those cps that the book believed to be unfair.
that and their admitted selective use of this rule (where they will steal from winner who won these parlays, but NOT refund the losers who lost the parlays) is why this theft is injustifiable